Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 6, 2011·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Colorado Avalanche 0, Vancouver Canucks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

VAN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL01201209033
VAN1615412623

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:19VANDaniel SedinGWGAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.26 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:53VANJannik HansenAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Cody Hodgson · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P3 5:15VANDaniel SedinAssists: Henrik Sedin, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P3 5:49VANJannik HansenAssists: Alexander Edler, Keith Ballard · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:08VANDaniel SedinAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–5
  6. P3 9:40VANAlexander EdlerPPAssists: Cody Hodgson, Cory Schneider · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–6
Penalties (20)
  1. P1 10:55COLKevin Porter: Kneeing5 min
  2. P1 10:55COLKevin Porter: Game misconduct10 min
  3. P1 17:23VANRyan Kesler: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 11:49VANAlexander Edler: Holding2 min
  5. P2 13:05VANDan Hamhuis: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 17:05COLTJ Galiardi: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 2:46COLJay McClement: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 4:51COLKyle Quincey: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 4:51VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 8:27COLKyle Quincey: Roughing2 min · PPG
  11. P3 8:27VANMaxim Lapierre: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 8:27VANDale Weise: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 8:27COLKyle Quincey: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 11:12VANKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 11:59COLGabriel Landeskog: High sticking2 min
  16. P3 14:46COLChuck Kobasew: Misconduct10 min
  17. P3 14:46VANVictor Oreskovich: Holding2 min
  18. P3 14:46COLShane O'Brien: Fighting5 min
  19. P3 14:46VANVictor Oreskovich: Fighting5 min
  20. P3 14:46VANMaxim Lapierre: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← COL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLVAN
33Shots on goal23
1.8Expected goals2.0
63Shot attempts38
22Faceoffs won18
5Power plays5
42Penalty minutes39
40Hits18
7Blocked shots20
5Giveaways8
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKobasew – McClement – Winnik5:11

    xG 0.25–0.12 (67%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Yip – Galiardi – Duchene2:23

    xG 0.07–0.03 (72%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Hejduk – O'Reilly – Landeskog9:26

    xG 0.36–0.51 (41%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  4. Jones – Galiardi – Duchene5:03

    xG 0.09–0.55 (14%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestQuincey – Johnson6:10

    xG 0.43–0.22 (66%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Hejda – Elliott2:32

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Quincey – O'Brien2:22

    xG 0.00–0.00 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows6:28

    xG 0.64–0.03 (96%)attempts 5–2goals 2–0

  2. Kesler – Hansen – Raymond4:33

    xG 0.30–0.05 (86%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Raymond – Hodgson – Weise2:16

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Malhotra – Lapierre – Oreskovich3:03

    xG 0.00–0.23 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa13:06

    xG 0.75–0.22 (77%)attempts 10–16goals 2–0

  2. Ballard – Rome9:16

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Edler10:06

    xG 0.22–0.55 (28%)attempts 4–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.0 xGCOL 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 4/100 · #1169 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

VAN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).