- Age
- 40
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 90 kg
- Born
- Rodovre, DNK
- Draft
- 2004, round 9, #287 (VAN)
Career · 2009–10 to 2017–18
- Games
- 566
- Goals
- 103
- Points
- 235
- TOI per game
- 14:53
- xGF% (5v5)
- 48.8%
- Goals above expected
- +17.7
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
| 2009–10 |   VAN | 47 | 9 | 6 | 15 | −5 | 12:20 | 67 | 13.4% | 0 | 5.8 | – |
| 2010–11 | VAN | 82 | 9 | 20 | 29 | +13 | 14:43 | 113 | 8.0% | 0 | 9.8 | 49.7% |
| 2011–12 | VAN | 82 | 16 | 23 | 39 | +18 | 14:54 | 137 | 11.7% | 0 | 11.9 | 46.8% |
| 2012–13 | VAN | 47 | 10 | 17 | 27 | +12 | 17:33 | 99 | 10.1% | 3 | 8.5 | 48.9% |
| 2013–14 | VAN | 71 | 11 | 9 | 20 | −9 | 15:40 | 112 | 9.8% | 1 | 10.2 | 49.7% |
| 2014–15 | VAN | 81 | 16 | 17 | 33 | −6 | 13:58 | 145 | 11.0% | 0 | 14.5 | 47.7% |
| 2015–16 | VAN | 67 | 22 | 16 | 38 | +16 | 16:26 | 117 | 18.8% | 1 | 10.9 | 45.7% |
| 2016–17 | VAN | 28 | 6 | 7 | 13 | +2 | 16:21 | 56 | 10.7% | 0 | 5.9 | 51.2% |
| 2016–17 |   SJS | 15 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 15:30 | 17 | 11.8% | 0 | 2.7 | 59.6% |
| 2016–17 | All teams | 43 | 8 | 12 | 20 | +2 | 16:03 | 73 | 11.0% | 0 | 8.6 | 54.0% |
| 2017–18 | SJS | 46 | 2 | 12 | 14 | +2 | 12:02 | 54 | 3.7% | 0 | 5.1 | 49.6% |
| Total | 2 teams | 566 | 103 | 132 | 235 | +43 | 14:53 | 917 | 11.2% | 5 | 85.3 | 48.8% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2017–18 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd line
62nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd line- Goals /600.7361st pct
- Assists /600.9459th pct
- ixG /600.6136th pct
- Goals above expected+17.794th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)48.8%46th pct
- CF% (5v5)50.0%58th pct
- Relative xGF%−0.157th pct
- Penalty diff /600.1152nd pct
Usage
2nd line- TOI per game14:5364th pct
- PP time share8.7%37th pct
- Offensive zone starts46.8%26th pct
- Quality of competition24.5%67th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Hansen wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2017–18, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1739+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
34.6%
56–106 · below the 1739 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
34.8%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
−25
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.5
162 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone37.3% 25–42
- Neutral zone31.5% 17–37
- Defensive zone34.1% 14–27
By strength
- Even strength34.2% 40–77
- Power play40.0% 2–3
- Shorthanded35.0% 14–26
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +30 after a win, −2 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.4 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Anze Kopitar14.3% 1–6
- Paul Stastny20.0% 1–4
- Joe Thornton50.0% 2–2
- Jonathan Toews0.0% 0–4
- Mikko Koivu0.0% 0–4
- Nicklas Backstrom0.0% 0–4
- Antoine Vermette0.0% 0–3
- Shawn Horcoff33.3% 1–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 14 | 42.9% | 43.1% |
| 2010–11 | 19 | 42.1% | 41.1% |
| 2011–12 | 29 | 41.4% | 41.8% |
| 2012–13 | 31 | 9.7% | 11.6% |
| 2013–14 | 29 | 41.4% | 40.9% |
| 2014–15 | 6 | 16.7% | 14.6% |
| 2015–16 | 21 | 28.6% | 29.3% |
| 2016–17 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| 2017–18 | 12 | 66.7% | 66.1% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+17.7 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games