Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 10, 2011·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Boston Bruins 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 78% of the time.

CBJ winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS2719213529
CBJ213112011336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:46CBJRick NashAssists: Vinny Prospal, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:09CBJJeff CarterPPAssists: Derick Brassard, James Wisniewski · Backhand, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:26BOSJoe CorvoAssists: Milan Lucic, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:11BOSNathan HortonAssists: Milan Lucic, Andrew Ference · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 0:58BOSZdeno CharaPPAssists: Milan Lucic, David Krejci · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P2 16:05CBJR.J. UmbergerAssists: Samuel Pahlsson, Derek MacKenzie · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:44BOSJoe CorvoPPGWGAssists: Dennis Seidenberg, Tyler Seguin · Slap, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:34BOSChris KellyPPAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand · Snap, 0.22 xG5–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 2:57BOSShawn Thornton: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:57CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 8:20CBJRyan Johansen: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 10:34BOSMilan Lucic: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 14:08BOSMilan Lucic: Slashing2 min
  6. P1 14:08BOSMilan Lucic: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 0:40CBJDerick Brassard: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 3:27BOSAndrew Ference: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 5:24CBJRick Nash: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 7:47BOSPatrice Bergeron: Hooking2 min
  11. P2 13:03CBJDerek Dorsett: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  12. P2 16:05BOSDavid Krejci: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P2 16:05CBJSamuel Pahlsson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  14. P2 19:54BOSMilan Lucic: Tripping2 min
  15. P3 5:28CBJAntoine Vermette: Hooking2 min · PPG
  16. P3 18:26CBJFedor Tyutin: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← BOS attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Peverley won the faceoff against Vermette
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSCBJ
29Shots on goal36
1.9Expected goals3.6
48Shot attempts69
27Faceoffs won23
6Power plays6
19Penalty minutes19
14Hits28
17Blocked shots10
2Giveaways2
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Seguin8:57

    xG 0.47–0.22 (68%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Campbell – Caron4:53

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Horton – Krejci – Lucic9:36

    xG 0.41–0.78 (34%)attempts 10–16goals 2–2

  4. Kelly – Peverley – Pouliot7:47

    xG 0.20–0.58 (25%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Boychuk5:06

    xG 0.34–0.20 (63%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  2. Corvo – Seidenberg8:03

    xG 0.33–0.28 (54%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Seidenberg – Boychuk4:32

    xG 0.08–0.11 (40%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Brassard – Johansen8:55

    xG 0.54–0.20 (73%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Pahlsson – Umberger – Dorsett4:01

    xG 0.19–0.03 (85%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Prospal – Nash – Carter10:10

    xG 0.67–0.62 (52%)attempts 14–15goals 1–1

  4. MacKenzie – Boll – Letestu3:01

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClitsome – Moore14:27

    xG 0.78–0.29 (73%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  2. Tyutin – Nikitin11:24

    xG 0.51–0.24 (68%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  3. Wisniewski – Methot9:14

    xG 0.44–0.52 (46%)attempts 9–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.6 xGBOS 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #119 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.06 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 78% of the time.

CBJ winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).