Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 17, 2011·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 83% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF190624319
PIT4132825826

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:17PITJason WilliamsAssists: Alexandre Picard, Craig Adams · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:07PITSimon DespresPPAssists: Tyler Kennedy, Jason Williams · Snap, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:43PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Chris Kunitz, Brooks Orpik · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P1 12:55BUFThomas VanekAssists: Robyn Regehr, Jason Pominville · Snap, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P1 17:30PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Carl Sneep, Alexandre Picard · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P2 0:53PITJames NealPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Matt Niskanen · Snap, 0.06 xG1–5
  7. P2 17:54PITDeryk EngellandAssists: Arron Asham, Pascal Dupuis · Snap, 0.05 xG1–6
  8. P3 8:49BUFLuke AdamUnassisted · Snap, 0.04 xG2–6
  9. P3 10:13BUFPaul GaustadAssists: Drew Stafford, Andrej Sekera · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–6
  10. P3 11:43PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: James Neal, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–7
  11. P3 13:39PITChris KunitzAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Deryk Engelland · Snap, 0.06 xG3–8
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:26BUFMike Weber: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:55BUFPaul Szczechura: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:10PITArron Asham: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 0:43PITMatt Niskanen: Interference2 min
  5. P3 6:02BUFMarc-Andre Gragnani: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 11:01BUFMarc-Andre Gragnani: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 13:52BUFRobyn Regehr: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Roy
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
19Shots on goal26
1.1Expected goals2.8
32Shot attempts64
24Faceoffs won38
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
10Hits19
22Blocked shots8
4Giveaways3
2Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Ellis – Stafford2:17

    xG 0.10–0.04 (72%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  2. Szczechura – Adam – Kassian2:23

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Gaustad – McCormick – Ellis2:09

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Vanek – Szczechura7:13

    xG 0.01–0.13 (10%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Regehr – Sekera13:49

    xG 0.38–0.50 (43%)attempts 12–14goals 2–0

  2. Gragnani – Weber10:06

    xG 0.19–0.63 (24%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

  3. Leopold – Ehrhoff14:29

    xG 0.18–0.71 (21%)attempts 6–12goals 0–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Neal9:39

    xG 1.07–0.21 (83%)attempts 13–7goals 3–2

  2. Cooke – Dupuis – Kennedy2:57

    xG 0.22–0.03 (87%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Williams – Tangradi2:54

    xG 0.16–0.05 (75%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  4. Cooke – Williams – Kennedy2:34

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Despres14:43

    xG 1.39–0.38 (79%)attempts 18–11goals 2–0

  2. Picard – Sneep13:07

    xG 0.52–0.12 (82%)attempts 15–5goals 2–1

  3. Orpik – Niskanen11:24

    xG 0.25–0.21 (55%)attempts 9–6goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.8 xGBUF 1.1 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #360 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.65 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 83% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).