
Centre · #19
Jason Williams
- Age
- 46
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 87 kg
- Born
- London, CAN
- Draft
- Undrafted
Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12
- Games
- 79
- Goals
- 9
- Points
- 22
- TOI per game
- 11:23
- xGF% (5v5)
- 41.9%
- Goals above expected
- +0.6
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
17th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd line- Goals /600.6038th pct
- Assists /600.8743rd pct
- ixG /600.5624th pct
- Goals above expected+0.661st pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)41.9%7th pct
- CF% (5v5)47.1%25th pct
- Relative xGF%−9.44th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.1325th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game11:2324th pct
- PP time share13.4%42nd pct
- Offensive zone starts76.3%98th pct
- Quality of competition23.5%27th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Williams wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
45.7%
48–57 · below the 610 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
44.9%
Opponents won 49.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.8% against them.
Wins above average
−5
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
2.7
105 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone50.0% 25–25
- Neutral zone47.5% 19–21
- Defensive zone26.7% 4–11
By strength
- Even strength45.0% 45–55
- Power play50.0% 2–2
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +21 after a win, +2 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Sam Gagner66.7% 6–3
- James Sheppard50.0% 3–3
- Brendan Morrison33.3% 2–4
- Jay McClement80.0% 4–1
- Matt Stajan25.0% 1–3
- Eric Nystrom75.0% 3–1
- Kyle Brodziak25.0% 1–3
- Henrik Sedin0.0% 0–3
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 60 | 50.0% | 48.7% |
| 2010–11 | 44 | 40.9% | 40.8% |
| 2011–12 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+0.6 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games