Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 26, 2011·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Edmonton Oilers 3, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

VAN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM052917321
VAN3131518526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:11VANAndrew EbbettAssists: Chris Higgins, Kevin Bieksa · Deflected, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:13VANDaniel SedinAssists: Henrik Sedin, Keith Ballard · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:51VANAndrew EbbettAssists: Jannik Hansen, Cody Hodgson · Deflected, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:50EDMJordan EberlePPAssists: Corey Potter, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–3
  5. P2 11:36VANAlexandre BurrowsSHGWGAssists: Ryan Kesler · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–4
  6. P2 12:18EDMRyan SmythPPAssists: Ryan Jones, Sam Gagner · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–4
  7. P3 3:14VANRyan KeslerAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Alexander Edler · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 5:04EDMRyan JonesAssists: Corey Potter, Jordan Eberle · Deflected, 0.14 xG3–5
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 1:03EDMLadislav Smid: Interference2 min
  2. P1 5:22VANRyan Kesler: Charging2 min
  3. P1 10:30EDMEric Belanger: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 16:51EDMBen Eager: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 16:51VANAndrew Alberts: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 19:25VANAndrew Alberts: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 2:32EDMShawn Horcoff: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 5:24EDMBen Eager: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 5:24VANAlexander Edler: Elbowing2 min
  10. P2 8:28VANDale Weise: Charging5 min · PPG
  11. P2 8:28VANDale Weise: Game misconduct10 min
  12. P3 2:13EDMEric Belanger: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 2:13VANKeith Ballard: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 11:59VANHenrik Sedin: Tripping2 min
  15. P3 13:50EDMRyan Smyth: Interference2 min
  16. P3 19:43VANJannik Hansen: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← EDM attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Horcoff
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMVAN
21Shots on goal26
1.8Expected goals2.5
39Shot attempts53
22Faceoffs won32
7Power plays4
14Penalty minutes29
15Hits15
12Blocked shots12
5Giveaways8
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Smyth – Horcoff – Gagner7:05

    xG 0.13–0.10 (56%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  2. Belanger – Eager – Jones5:08

    xG 0.05–0.13 (26%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  3. Eberle – Hall – Nugent-Hopkins9:19

    xG 0.07–0.23 (22%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPotter – Peckham2:26

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  2. Gilbert – Peckham2:39

    xG 0.03–0.01 (74%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Peckham – Plante3:00

    xG 0.05–0.08 (38%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHiggins – Kesler – Raymond5:41

    xG 0.40–0.03 (93%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows7:46

    xG 0.20–0.10 (67%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  3. Hansen – Ebbett – Hodgson3:37

    xG 0.11–0.05 (70%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

  4. Malhotra – Lapierre – Weise2:13

    xG 0.06–0.02 (77%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa9:22

    xG 0.44–0.08 (85%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Alberts – Ballard9:30

    xG 0.28–0.05 (86%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

  3. Salo – Edler9:06

    xG 0.08–0.32 (20%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.5 xGEDM 1.8 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #385 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.92 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

VAN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).