Mon, Jan 9, 2012·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise
Vancouver Canucks 1, Florida Panthers 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 110 | 02 | 014 | 126 |
| FLA | 06 | 214 | 02 | 222 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 3:11VANDale WeiseAssists: Manny Malhotra · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–0
- P2 5:00FLADmitry KulikovAssists: Marcel Goc, Shawn Matthias · Slap, 0.07 xG1–1
- P2 10:52FLAMarcel GocPPGWGAssists: Tomas Kopecky, Kris Versteeg · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
Penalties (8)
- P1 4:58VANKeith Ballard: Roughing2 min
- P1 4:58VANKeith Ballard: Roughing2 min
- P1 4:58FLAMichal Repik: Slashing2 min
- P1 12:33FLAKris Versteeg: Tripping2 min
- P2 6:21FLADmitry Kulikov: Hooking2 min
- P2 9:15VANDale Weise: Holding2 min · PPG
- P3 0:39FLAMikael Samuelsson: Tripping2 min
- P3 19:31VANAlexandre Burrows: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Madden won the faceoff against Kesler
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestKesler – Raymond – Hodgson4:48
xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0
- Higgins – Kesler – Hansen8:20
xG 0.17–0.03 (83%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
- Malhotra – Duco – Weise6:06
xG 0.34–0.24 (59%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0
- Sedin – Sedin – Burrows12:54
xG 0.14–0.21 (41%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSulzer – Edler11:42
xG 0.47–0.33 (59%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0
- Bieksa – Sulzer2:05
xG 0.18–0.11 (62%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Hamhuis – Edler6:34
xG 0.10–0.03 (77%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestWeiss – Fleischmann – Versteeg8:38
xG 0.40–0.12 (77%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1
- Kopecky – Goc – Matthias4:32
xG 0.21–0.12 (63%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0
- Madden – Samuelsson – Versteeg5:00
xG 0.13–0.15 (45%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Weiss – Fleischmann – Repik3:13
xG 0.02–0.05 (29%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestCampbell – Garrison14:20
xG 0.26–0.13 (67%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0
- Campbell – Kulikov2:03
xG 0.14–0.10 (60%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Weaver – Kulikov15:12
xG 0.32–0.35 (48%)attempts 8–14goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (FLA − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).