Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
43
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
89 kg
Born
Calw, DEU
Draft
2001, round 1, #20 (SJS)

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
371
Goals
55
Points
134
TOI per game
15:27
xGF% (5v5)
48.1%
Goals above expected
+2.7

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NSH73121830+1014:4111810.2%09.5–
2010–11NSH5191524+1016:021118.1%09.048.3%
2011–12FLA57111627+517:379711.3%48.353.3%
2012–13FLA4291019−618:16929.8%68.442.0%
2013–14FLA62111223−716:5910510.5%210.147.8%
2013–14PIT12022012:55120.0%00.637.6%
2013–14All teams74111425−716:201179.4%210.746.7%
2014–15PIT43246−212:27434.7%03.948.8%
2014–15STL31123−110:38342.9%02.549.1%
2014–15All teams74369−311:41773.9%06.448.9%
Total4 teams3715579134+915:276129.0%1252.348.1%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8150100150200250300350
8m10m12m14m16m18m20m50100150200250300350Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

48th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd line
  • Goals /600.5839th pct
  • Assists /600.8343rd pct
  • ixG /600.5525th pct
  • Goals above expected+2.774th pct

Play-driving

3rd line
  • xGF% (5v5)48.1%38th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.8%63rd pct
  • Relative xGF%−1.938th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1557th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game15:2766th pct
  • PP time share17.5%49th pct
  • Offensive zone starts38.2%11th pct
  • Quality of competition24.7%74th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Goc wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

52.3%

2765–2520 · #48 of 184 regulars, 74th percentile

Against an average centre

52.5%

Opponents won 50.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.8% against them.

Wins above average

+131

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

14.3

5,285 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

51%894 · +0.757%716 · +1.246%632 · +1.056%215 · +0.745%212 · +1.859%236 · +0.847%207 · +0.155%1379 · +1.951%794 · +1.7Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone52.0% 712–656
  • Neutral zone51.3% 905–859
  • Defensive zone53.3% 1148–1005

By strength

  • Even strength52.8% 2149–1921
  • Power play58.4% 195–139
  • Shorthanded47.9% 405–441

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +8 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1091052.1%52.3%
2010–1169349.9%50.4%
2011–1297851.6%51.4%
2012–1378652.2%52.5%
2013–14123353.4%53.8%
2014–1568554.3%54.0%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+2.7 goals above expected

010203040506050100150200250300350Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120