Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 18, 2012·United Center, Chicago

Buffalo Sabres 2, Chicago Blackhawks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 87% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF1101809227
CHI214210211635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:30BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Jochen Hecht · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:58CHIAndrew ShawAssists: Duncan Keith, Steve Montador · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:41CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Andrew Shaw, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.49 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:28BUFJason PominvillePPAssists: Brad Boyes, Tyler Myers · Slap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:36CHIMarian HossaGWGAssists: Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P2 13:25CHIJimmy HayesAssists: Andrew Brunette, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:11CHIDave BollandAssists: Jimmy Hayes, Nick Leddy · Slap, 0.06 xG2–5
  8. P3 6:48CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Dave Bolland, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:54BUFDerek Roy: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:44BUFMike Weber: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:32CHIJimmy Hayes: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:12CHIJamal Mayers: Boarding2 min
  5. P2 15:13CHIAndrew Shaw: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:28BUFTJ Brennan: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  7. P3 6:39BUFTyler Myers: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 12:04CHIAndrew Brunette: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hecht won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCHI
27Shots on goal35
1.4Expected goals3.8
41Shot attempts57
19Faceoffs won31
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
17Hits16
14Blocked shots9
3Giveaways3
5Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKaleta – Gerbe – Adam3:03

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Gaustad – Ellis – Kaleta5:18

    xG 0.16–0.07 (71%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Kaleta – Leino2:55

    xG 0.13–0.06 (68%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Boyes – Gerbe – Adam5:06

    xG 0.14–0.16 (47%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Sekera – Myers11:45

    xG 0.27–0.34 (44%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  2. Gragnani – Myers2:18

    xG 0.04–0.13 (23%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Gragnani – Weber8:39

    xG 0.14–0.25 (37%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestMayers – Frolik – Smith8:31

    xG 0.48–0.18 (73%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Stalberg – Toews – Kane13:38

    xG 0.55–0.27 (67%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Hossa – Kruger – Shaw10:01

    xG 0.23–0.08 (74%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  4. Brunette – Bolland – Hayes6:44

    xG 0.17–0.17 (50%)attempts 3–3goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHjalmarsson – Leddy12:01

    xG 0.60–0.21 (74%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  2. O'Donnell – Montador9:58

    xG 0.40–0.15 (73%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Leddy2:39

    xG 0.24–0.06 (79%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.8 xGBUF 1.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #536 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.30 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 87% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).