Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 21, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Dallas Stars 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL1111707225
MIN0541417526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:38DALEric NystromAssists: Stephane Robidas, Vernon Fiddler · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 9:06MINDevin SetoguchiPPAssists: Dany Heatley, Nate Prosser · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:03DALPhilip LarsenAssists: Alex Goligoski, Loui Eriksson · Slap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:37MINCal ClutterbuckAssists: Matt Cullen, Devin Setoguchi · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:51MINChad RauGWGAssists: Carson McMillan, Jed Ortmeyer · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:36MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Dany Heatley, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–4
  7. P3 1:29MINDany HeatleyAssists: Warren Peters, Greg Zanon · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:14MINJustin Falk: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 8:08DALRadek Dvorak: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:07DALSteve Ott: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 9:07MINDarroll Powe: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 11:19DALSteve Ott: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 11:19MINDarroll Powe: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 6:20DALMichael Ryder: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 12:08DALSteve Ott: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← DAL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fiddler won the faceoff against Cullen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALMIN
25Shots on goal26
1.2Expected goals1.7
53Shot attempts44
27Faceoffs won33
1Power plays3
13Penalty minutes9
19Hits21
11Blocked shots19
2Giveaways4
1Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Fiddler – Nystrom10:33

    xG 0.25–0.02 (91%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  2. Petersen – Dowell – Vincour6:14

    xG 0.04–0.02 (67%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Morrow – Ott – Burish10:10

    xG 0.19–0.31 (38%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  4. Ryder – Eriksson – Wandell11:00

    xG 0.14–0.54 (20%)attempts 10–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSouray – Robidas11:05

    xG 0.44–0.29 (60%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

  2. Daley – Grossmann16:48

    xG 0.19–0.22 (46%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Larsen18:30

    xG 0.42–0.55 (43%)attempts 24–14goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Brodziak – Johnson13:33

    xG 0.57–0.43 (57%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Setoguchi – Clutterbuck10:56

    xG 0.23–0.11 (67%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Ortmeyer – Kassian – Rau3:15

    xG 0.03–0.01 (69%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Peters – Powe – McMillan5:46

    xG 0.03–0.05 (34%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Stoner17:18

    xG 0.57–0.35 (62%)attempts 18–19goals 1–0

  2. Falk – Prosser14:26

    xG 0.17–0.05 (77%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  3. Schultz – Spurgeon15:44

    xG 0.37–0.67 (36%)attempts 8–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.7 xGDAL 1.2 xG
00.511.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #506 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).