Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 4, 2012·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Minnesota Wild 1, Dallas Stars 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 70% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN013010110011134
DAL01011004022226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 15:12DALMike RibeiroPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Stephane Robidas · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P3 5:18MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Nick Johnson · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Erik Christensen stopped
  2. 2. DAL Loui Eriksson scored
  3. 3. MIN Matt Cullen scored
  4. 4. DAL Jamie Benn scored
  5. 5. MIN Jared Spurgeon stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:57DALSteve Ott: Interference2 min
  2. P2 4:48DALMichael Ryder: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 9:29DALVernon Fiddler: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 13:53MINMatt Cullen: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 18:53DALSheldon Souray: Hooking2 min
  6. OT 4:04MINCal Clutterbuck: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Benn won the faceoff against Brodziak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDAL
34Shots on goal26
3.1Expected goals1.9
63Shot attempts59
27Faceoffs won32
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
21Hits30
21Blocked shots15
4Giveaways9
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Brodziak – Johnson14:31

    xG 1.20–0.35 (78%)attempts 21–14goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Setoguchi – Clutterbuck11:35

    xG 0.58–0.10 (86%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Christensen – Powe – McMillan7:05

    xG 0.09–0.09 (50%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Peters – Powe – McMillan2:22

    xG 0.03–0.09 (28%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Zidlicky16:31

    xG 0.99–0.49 (67%)attempts 17–18goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Spurgeon15:06

    xG 0.77–0.41 (65%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0

  3. Falk – Prosser14:29

    xG 0.49–0.23 (68%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBurish – Dowell – Wandell5:19

    xG 0.39–0.03 (93%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Ryder – Ott – Benn14:26

    xG 0.33–0.13 (72%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  3. Ribeiro – Nystrom – Eriksson13:02

    xG 0.30–0.67 (31%)attempts 13–13goals 0–0

  4. Dvorak – Fiddler – Vincour8:04

    xG 0.04–0.88 (4%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Goligoski – Larsen15:52

    xG 0.27–0.25 (52%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Souray – Robidas13:25

    xG 0.39–0.82 (32%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  3. Daley – Grossmann18:16

    xG 0.42–1.38 (23%)attempts 17–24goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 1.9 xGMIN 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #665 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.41 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 70% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).