Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 9, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Vancouver Canucks 5, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 65% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN291724520
MIN1509110224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:13MINDany HeatleyAssists: Devin Setoguchi · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:04VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Sami Salo · Wrist, 0.59 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:18VANMaxim LapierreUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:50VANHenrik SedinGWGAssists: Byron Bitz, Daniel Sedin · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:32VANManny MalhotraAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Jannik Hansen · Tip-in, 0.12 xG4–1
  6. P3 15:58MINDevin SetoguchiPPAssists: Nate Prosser · Snap, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:47VANRyan KeslerENAssists: Alexandre Burrows, David Booth · Wrist, 0.70 xG5–2
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 1:49VANByron Bitz: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 12:35MINMatt Cullen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:49MINNate Prosser: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 1:35MINErik Christensen: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 11:02VANMason Raymond: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P3 1:46MINCal Clutterbuck: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 1:46VANMaxim Lapierre: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 14:09VANAaron Rome: Holding2 min · PPG
  9. P3 19:32VANMaxim Lapierre: Spearing5 min
  10. P3 19:32VANMaxim Lapierre: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P3 19:41VANDan Hamhuis: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 19:41VANKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 19:41VANKevin Bieksa: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 19:41MINDany Heatley: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 19:41MINCal Clutterbuck: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Malhotra
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANMIN
20Shots on goal24
2.6Expected goals1.9
38Shot attempts45
30Faceoffs won30
3Power plays4
48Penalty minutes23
22Hits22
16Blocked shots10
8Giveaways14
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Bitz10:34

    xG 0.56–0.27 (67%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  2. Lapierre – Duco – Hodgson6:07

    xG 0.16–0.02 (91%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Malhotra – Hansen – Raymond10:33

    xG 0.21–0.22 (49%)attempts 6–6goals 1–1

  4. Burrows – Kesler – Booth9:28

    xG 0.04–0.15 (22%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa14:04

    xG 0.72–0.35 (67%)attempts 11–8goals 2–0

  2. Alberts – Rome16:16

    xG 0.11–0.07 (60%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Edler15:15

    xG 0.22–0.76 (22%)attempts 7–16goals 1–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Christensen – Clutterbuck9:31

    xG 0.21–0.08 (74%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  2. Heatley – Koivu – Setoguchi12:46

    xG 0.21–0.08 (73%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  3. Peters – Staubitz – Powe4:06

    xG 0.01–0.07 (15%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Johnson – McMillan7:01

    xG 0.15–0.52 (23%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Zidlicky15:07

    xG 0.72–0.08 (90%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Falk – Prosser12:20

    xG 0.14–0.34 (29%)attempts 7–11goals 0–2

  3. Schultz – Spurgeon14:22

    xG 0.30–0.55 (35%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.9 xGVAN 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #555 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 65% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).