Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 18, 2012·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Chicago Blackhawks 6, Columbus Blue Jackets 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 62% of the time.

CBJ winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI21121225628
CBJ110014010134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:13CBJDerick BrassardUnassisted · Slap, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:27CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Patrick Sharp, Duncan Keith · Backhand, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:48CHIViktor StalbergGWGAssists: Bryan Bickell, Dylan Olsen · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:39CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:30CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Sharp · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–1
  6. P3 4:43CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Andrew Brunette, Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–1
  7. P3 5:32CHISami LepistoAssists: Dave Bolland · Slap, 0.04 xG6–1
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 9:49CBJDerek MacKenzie: Fighting5 min
  2. P2 9:49CHIJimmy Hayes: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 16:37CHIDave Bolland: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 5:43CHIJohn Scott: Fighting5 min
  5. P3 5:43CBJDerek Dorsett: Instigator2 min
  6. P3 5:43CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 5:43CBJDerek Dorsett: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 5:43CBJDerek Dorsett: Instigator misconduct10 min
  9. P3 11:02CBJJohn Moore: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKenzie won the faceoff against Bolland
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICBJ
28Shots on goal34
2.5Expected goals1.9
50Shot attempts54
24Faceoffs won25
2Power plays1
12Penalty minutes34
8Hits29
12Blocked shots10
4Giveaways4
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSharp – Toews – Kane12:06

    xG 1.24–0.49 (72%)attempts 18–11goals 3–1

  2. Brunette – Hossa – Kruger9:42

    xG 0.56–0.24 (70%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Bolland – Bickell – Stalberg8:38

    xG 0.34–0.17 (66%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  4. Mayers – Hossa – Hayes2:25

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Olsen12:44

    xG 0.78–0.30 (72%)attempts 11–11goals 3–0

  2. Seabrook – Leddy17:32

    xG 0.74–0.43 (63%)attempts 14–18goals 1–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook4:09

    xG 0.27–0.10 (72%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Pahlsson – Vermette – Dorsett8:51

    xG 0.15–0.16 (49%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. MacKenzie – Russell – Gillies6:54

    xG 0.03–0.25 (12%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  3. Prospal – Carter – Letestu12:15

    xG 0.28–0.60 (32%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  4. Umberger – Nash – Brassard12:34

    xG 0.31–0.86 (26%)attempts 13–18goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. Lebda – Savard15:15

    xG 0.38–0.37 (50%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  2. Wisniewski – Moore16:59

    xG 0.42–0.70 (38%)attempts 15–13goals 0–3

  3. Tyutin – Johnson16:02

    xG 0.46–0.93 (33%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.9 xGCHI 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 27/100 · #864 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 62% of the time.

CBJ winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).