Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 22, 2012·Pepsi Center, Denver

Los Angeles Kings 1, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 67% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK01001419133
COL31111105427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:04COLMark OlverAssists: David Jones, Daniel Winnik · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:04COLPaul StastnyGWGUnassisted · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:22COLJay McClementAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Chuck Kobasew · Deflected, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P2 12:45COLPaul StastnyAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–4
  5. P3 4:35LAKDrew DoughtyAssists: Mike Richards · Slap, 0.02 xG1–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 14:16COLSteve Downie: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 8:58LAKKyle Clifford: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 8:58COLRyan Wilson: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 8:58COLChuck Kobasew: Misconduct10 min
  5. P2 8:58LAKJordan Nolan: Misconduct10 min
  6. P2 8:58LAKJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 10:13COLGabriel Landeskog: Holding2 min
  8. P2 13:56COLRyan O'Byrne: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← LAK attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Richards
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCOL
33Shots on goal27
2.6Expected goals1.6
60Shot attempts48
22Faceoffs won20
3Power plays1
14Penalty minutes18
16Hits17
15Blocked shots14
7Giveaways7
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Richards – King5:03

    xG 0.42–0.11 (79%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Williams – Richards – Kopitar8:54

    xG 0.31–0.15 (67%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Stoll – Richardson – Clifford2:48

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Brown – King7:19

    xG 0.33–0.19 (63%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Doughty18:23

    xG 0.86–0.16 (84%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

  2. Greene – Martinez11:37

    xG 0.25–0.18 (59%)attempts 14–7goals 0–1

  3. Mitchell – Greene2:30

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Kobasew – McClement – McLeod5:29

    xG 0.03–0.00 (93%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Winnik – Olver9:50

    xG 0.31–0.37 (46%)attempts 11–13goals 1–1

  3. Hejduk – Stastny – Duchene13:11

    xG 0.49–0.66 (43%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  4. Downie – O'Reilly – Landeskog12:38

    xG 0.18–0.43 (29%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Elliott2:29

    xG 0.41–0.20 (67%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  2. O'Brien – Wilson5:21

    xG 0.24–0.09 (72%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. O'Brien – Johnson3:16

    xG 0.16–0.03 (82%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.6 xGLAK 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1046 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.51 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 67% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).