Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 25, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Tampa Bay Lightning 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 69% of the time.

PIT winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL011114010135
PIT39212313834

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:09PITChris KunitzAssists: Evgeni Malkin, James Neal · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:59PITMatt CookeGWGAssists: Joe Vitale, Zbynek Michalek · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:40PITJordan StaalSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.16 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:11PITJordan StaalPPAssists: Steve Sullivan, James Neal · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–4
  5. P2 16:03PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Chris Kunitz, Deryk Engelland · Slap, 0.04 xG0–5
  6. P2 17:28TBLTeddy PurcellPPAssists: Ryan Malone, Brett Clark · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–5
  7. P3 5:50PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–6
  8. P3 13:42PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: James Neal, Steve Sullivan · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–7
  9. P3 19:12PITPascal DupuisAssists: Jordan Staal, Steve Sullivan · Wrist, 0.33 xG1–8
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 3:06PITZbynek Michalek: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 13:55PITZbynek Michalek: Interference2 min
  3. P2 5:51TBLMike Angelidis: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P2 5:51PITDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 8:23PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 8:23TBLDwayne Roloson: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 8:54TBLBrendan Mikkelson: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 13:41PITMatt Niskanen: Cross checking2 min
  9. P2 17:01TBLBrendan Mikkelson: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 17:01PITJoe Vitale: Fighting5 min · PPG
  11. P2 17:01PITJoe Vitale: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  12. P2 19:36PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 11:01PITJoe Vitale: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 12:36TBLBrett Connolly: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stamkos won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLPIT
35Shots on goal34
4.7Expected goals3.4
63Shot attempts58
26Faceoffs won36
6Power plays2
16Penalty minutes24
26Hits34
12Blocked shots16
3Giveaways3
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestWyman – Smith – Connolly3:01

    xG 0.21–0.02 (92%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Hall – Wyman – Smith2:31

    xG 0.22–0.06 (79%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Pyatt – Purcell6:53

    xG 0.30–0.22 (58%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  4. Angelidis – Wallace – Smith3:31

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Hedman13:46

    xG 1.59–0.22 (88%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  2. Mikkelson – Gilroy3:05

    xG 0.22–0.11 (66%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Gilroy8:18

    xG 0.66–0.67 (50%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Park – Adams – Tangradi2:39

    xG 0.12–0.07 (61%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Asham – Cooke – Vitale4:08

    xG 0.07–0.05 (60%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Sullivan – Dupuis – Staal5:32

    xG 0.49–0.61 (44%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

  4. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal9:25

    xG 0.44–0.89 (33%)attempts 9–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Michalek11:27

    xG 0.97–0.89 (52%)attempts 18–14goals 1–0

  2. Engelland – Niskanen15:57

    xG 0.37–0.91 (29%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Martin – Letang13:53

    xG 0.82–1.37 (38%)attempts 14–14goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.4 xGTBL 4.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1042 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 69% of the time.

PIT winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).