Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 3, 2012·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Anaheim Ducks 2, Los Angeles Kings 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 87% of the time.

LAK winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA11218011231
LAK172518420

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:15LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Alec Martinez, Slava Voynov · Wrist, 0.34 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:42ANASheldon BrookbankAssists: Bobby Ryan, Teemu Selanne · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:39LAKJeff CarterPPAssists: Dwight King, Mike Richards · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:53LAKJeff CarterGWGAssists: Mike Richards, Dwight King · Slap, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:06ANADevante Smith-PellyAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Toni Lydman · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:45LAKAnze KopitarENAssists: Mike Richards · Wrist, 0.63 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 2:21LAKColin Fraser: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:21ANAMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 4:36LAKJarret Stoll: Charging2 min
  4. P1 10:58ANALuca Sbisa: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 18:27LAKDustin Brown: Holding2 min
  6. P2 2:21ANANiklas Hagman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 5:34LAKMatt Greene: Interference2 min
  8. P2 9:22ANANick Bonino: Interference2 min
  9. P2 10:20ANACorey Perry: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 5:51LAKDrew Doughty: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richards won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANALAK
31Shots on goal20
1.9Expected goals4.4
50Shot attempts50
29Faceoffs won27
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
29Hits31
10Blocked shots9
9Giveaways12
0Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Beleskey2:52

    xG 0.19–0.06 (77%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Hagman – Getzlaf – Perry5:42

    xG 0.18–0.04 (80%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Blake – Cogliano – Smith-Pelly5:32

    xG 0.25–0.21 (54%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Blake – Getzlaf – Perry2:54

    xG 0.04–0.02 (63%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVisnovsky – Sbisa13:44

    xG 0.68–0.49 (58%)attempts 17–11goals 0–1

  2. Beauchemin – Fowler14:08

    xG 0.13–0.32 (30%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Lydman – Brookbank14:19

    xG 0.34–0.98 (26%)attempts 12–16goals 2–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Richards – King10:25

    xG 0.94–0.10 (90%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Stoll – Penner – Lewis10:08

    xG 0.41–0.14 (75%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Fraser – Clifford – Nolan5:47

    xG 0.13–0.13 (51%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Williams – Brown – Kopitar9:13

    xG 0.33–0.67 (33%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Martinez11:32

    xG 0.86–0.30 (74%)attempts 12–5goals 0–1

  2. Mitchell – Voynov10:54

    xG 0.63–0.21 (75%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Greene2:09

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 4.4 xGANA 1.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #623 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 87% of the time.

LAK winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).