Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 12, 2012·Jobing.com Arena, Glendale

Nashville Predators 5, Phoenix Coyotes 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 58% of the time.

PHX winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NSH18213113011535
PHX08210215020435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:31NSHMartin EratAssists: Sergei Kostitsyn, Hal Gill · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:49PHXDaymond LangkowAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Raffi Torres · Tip-in, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:04NSHMike FisherAssists: Sergei Kostitsyn, Martin Erat · Wrist, 0.29 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:23PHXKeith YandleAssists: Antoine Vermette, Ray Whitney · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:26NSHFrancis BouillonAssists: Martin Erat, Ryan Ellis · Wrist, 0.34 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:36NSHCraig SmithAssists: Paul Gaustad · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:11PHXOliver Ekman-LarssonAssists: Michal Rozsival, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:01PHXRaffi TorresAssists: Daymond Langkow, Shane Doan · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. PHX Ray Whitney stopped
  2. 2. NSH Andrei Kostitsyn scored
  3. 3. PHX Radim Vrbata stopped
  4. 4. NSH Martin Erat stopped
  5. 5. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 11:14PHXAntoine Vermette: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 16:43NSHSergei Kostitsyn: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 17:55PHXRay Whitney: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 7:27PHXMike Smith: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHX
45% to win55% to win
← NSH attackPHX attack →
  1. P1 20:00Langkow won the faceoff against Legwand
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHPHX
35Shots on goal35
2.9Expected goals2.4
58Shot attempts66
26Faceoffs won32
3Power plays1
2Penalty minutes6
29Hits33
14Blocked shots13
3Giveaways6
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Smith – Bourque7:59

    xG 0.58–0.17 (77%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Tootoo – Spaling – Wilson11:47

    xG 0.37–0.27 (58%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Fisher – Erat – Kostitsyn12:58

    xG 0.49–0.43 (53%)attempts 10–16goals 2–0

  4. Legwand – Kostitsyn – Hornqvist12:24

    xG 0.56–0.76 (43%)attempts 14–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGill – Hillen13:48

    xG 0.76–0.48 (61%)attempts 16–11goals 2–2

  2. Bouillon – Ellis9:22

    xG 0.55–0.42 (57%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Weber21:04

    xG 0.58–0.81 (41%)attempts 13–27goals 0–1

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestLangkow – Doan – Torres14:32

    xG 0.82–0.11 (88%)attempts 18–5goals 2–0

  2. Pouliot – Brule – Boedker6:04

    xG 0.26–0.26 (51%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  3. Whitney – Vrbata – Vermette12:46

    xG 0.61–0.60 (50%)attempts 18–13goals 2–0

  4. Pyatt – Gordon – Korpikoski11:23

    xG 0.28–0.67 (30%)attempts 9–16goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestRozsival – Ekman-Larsson18:16

    xG 0.93–0.08 (92%)attempts 23–6goals 3–0

  2. Aucoin – Yandle16:09

    xG 0.74–1.07 (41%)attempts 17–16goals 1–1

  3. Klesla – Stone14:55

    xG 0.39–0.87 (31%)attempts 15–22goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHX 2.4 xGNSH 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHXNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHX's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHX is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #27 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.75 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50PHX 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 58% of the time.

PHX winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PHX − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).