- Age
- 50
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 178 cm
- Weight
- 82 kg
- Born
- Edmonton, CAN
- Draft
- 1995, round 1, #5 (TBL)
Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12
- Games
- 149
- Goals
- 25
- Points
- 68
- TOI per game
- 17:15
- xGF% (5v5)
- 53.2%
- Goals above expected
- −2.1
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd line
59th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd line- Goals /600.5836th pct
- Assists /601.0057th pct
- ixG /600.6335th pct
- Goals above expected−2.138th pct
Play-driving
2nd line- xGF% (5v5)53.2%80th pct
- CF% (5v5)51.7%71st pct
- Relative xGF%+4.486th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.0535th pct
Usage
2nd line- TOI per game17:1576th pct
- PP time share27.8%56th pct
- Offensive zone starts51.5%35th pct
- Quality of competition24.6%61st pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Langkow wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
44.2%
956–1208 · #166 of 179 regulars, 8th percentile
Against an average centre
44.6%
Opponents won 50.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.5% against them.
Wins above average
−116
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
14.5
2,164 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone45.2% 317–385
- Neutral zone43.1% 329–434
- Defensive zone44.3% 310–389
By strength
- Even strength44.2% 729–919
- Power play53.7% 124–107
- Shorthanded36.4% 95–166
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +12 after a win, −11 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Shawn Horcoff45.1% 32–39
- Paul Stastny54.7% 35–29
- David Legwand45.8% 27–32
- Ryan Kesler40.7% 22–32
- Jonathan Toews34.7% 17–32
- Michal Handzus54.3% 25–21
- Mikko Koivu30.4% 14–32
- David Backes56.8% 25–19
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 1129 | 43.6% | 44.1% |
| 2010–11 | 43 | 53.5% | 52.2% |
| 2011–12 | 992 | 44.5% | 44.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−2.1 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games