Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #9

Dainius Zubrus

New Jersey Devils San Jose Sharks(traded during the season)
Age
48
Shoots
Left
Height
196 cm
Weight
102 kg
Born
Elektrenai, LTU
Draft
1996, round 1, #15 (PHI)

Career · 2009–10 to 2015–16

Games
440
Goals
62
Points
153
TOI per game
16:22
xGF% (5v5)
52.1%
Goals above expected
−0.8

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NJD51101727+416:298611.6%39.8–
2010–11NJD79131730−1117:0911511.3%314.055.0%
2011–12NJD82172744+718:4110915.6%612.951.1%
2012–13NJD22279−316:47229.1%02.859.1%
2013–14NJD82131326+117:3312110.7%013.354.5%
2014–15NJD744610−914:40725.6%16.643.6%
2015–16SJS50347+411:35339.1%03.454.9%
Total2 teams4406291153−716:2255811.1%1362.852.1%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.81100200300400
10m12m14m16m18m20m22m100200300400Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

50th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.5233rd pct
  • Assists /600.7638th pct
  • ixG /600.5221st pct
  • Goals above expected−0.850th pct

Play-driving

3rd line
  • xGF% (5v5)52.1%76th pct
  • CF% (5v5)51.7%74th pct
  • Relative xGF%−0.650th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.2020th pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game16:2276th pct
  • PP time share21.2%55th pct
  • Offensive zone starts49.4%32nd pct
  • Quality of competition24.8%77th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Zubrus wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2015–16, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1339+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

49.5%

917–937 · #111 of 193 regulars, 43rd percentile

Against an average centre

49.8%

Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.

Wins above average

−5

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

5.6

1,854 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

47%244 · +1.152%437 · +3.142%245 · +3.152%60 · −0.244%57 · −0.852%65 · −0.448%54 · +0.852%477 · +1.650%215 · +1.9Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone48.1% 322–348
  • Neutral zone47.8% 229–250
  • Defensive zone51.9% 366–339

By strength

  • Even strength47.9% 662–721
  • Power play59.0% 141–98
  • Shorthanded49.0% 102–106

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +14 after a win, −14 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.8 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1039948.6%49.3%
2010–1144956.3%56.4%
2011–1244143.3%44.0%
2012–132839.3%37.4%
2013–1442450.9%51.0%
2014–158643.0%42.8%
2015–162755.6%56.4%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.8 goals above expected

0204060100200300400Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−500+50+100