Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 13, 2012·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Boston Bruins 1, Tampa Bay Lightning 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 58% of the time.

TBL winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS02015117134
TBL4101314617

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:56TBLTom PyattAssists: Ryan Malone, Brett Connolly · Tip-in, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 2:26TBLNate ThompsonGWGAssists: Adam Hall, JT Wyman · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P1 4:31TBLRyan ShannonPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Dustin Tokarski · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–3
  4. P1 15:38TBLVictor HedmanUnassisted · Slap, 0.04 xG0–4
  5. P2 3:06TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Teddy Purcell, Brian Lee · Wrap-around, 0.03 xG0–5
  6. P3 1:55BOSJordan CaronAssists: Johnny Boychuk, Zdeno Chara · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–5
  7. P3 11:43TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Martin St. Louis, Brian Lee · Snap, 0.06 xG1–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 2:54BOSShawn Thornton: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:06BOSDaniel Paille: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 16:08TBLMike Commodore: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:08BOSShawn Thornton: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 19:25TBLMike Commodore: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 3:13TBLDustin Tokarski: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 7:13TBLVictor Hedman: Holding2 min
  8. P3 14:14BOSTyler Seguin: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← BOS attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Stamkos
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSTBL
34Shots on goal17
2.1Expected goals1.7
60Shot attempts34
34Faceoffs won29
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
23Hits22
10Blocked shots11
9Giveaways4
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestRolston – Whitfield – Kelly5:35

    xG 0.48–0.03 (95%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

  2. Krejci – Lucic – Caron5:22

    xG 0.32–0.10 (76%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Campbell – Paille6:27

    xG 0.28–0.08 (77%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Whitfield – Thornton – Campbell2:01

    xG 0.14–0.02 (85%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Seidenberg15:59

    xG 0.89–0.11 (89%)attempts 27–8goals 0–0

  2. Corvo – Zanon13:50

    xG 0.40–0.00 (100%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  3. Corvo – Ference2:27

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestHall – Thompson – Wyman7:21

    xG 0.45–0.07 (87%)attempts 4–2goals 2–0

  2. Malone – Shannon – Wallace3:47

    xG 0.02–0.09 (20%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Purcell – Stamkos10:45

    xG 0.19–0.29 (39%)attempts 5–9goals 2–0

  4. Malone – Pyatt – Connolly9:00

    xG 0.10–0.27 (28%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Commodore – Mikkelson4:27

    xG 0.10–0.07 (57%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  2. Mikkelson – Aulie3:38

    xG 0.09–0.10 (47%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Commodore – Aulie5:35

    xG 0.04–0.10 (28%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.7 xGBOS 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1048 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.48 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 58% of the time.

TBL winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).