Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 13, 2012·United Center, Chicago

St. Louis Blues 3, Chicago Blackhawks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 87% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL360808020324
CHI113111116061446

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:51CHIAndrew BrunetteAssists: Marian Hossa, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.24 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:50STLJamie LangenbrunnerAssists: Jason Arnott · Slap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:49STLAndy McDonaldAssists: David Perron, Patrik Berglund · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P1 15:59STLPatrik BerglundAssists: Barret Jackman, Andy McDonald · Tip-in, 0.18 xG3–1
  5. P2 14:13CHIViktor StalbergAssists: Marcus Kruger, Johnny Oduya · Tip-in, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:41CHIBrent SeabrookPPAssists: Marian Hossa, Patrick Sharp · Slap, 0.05 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Patrick Kane scored
  2. 2. STL T.J. Oshie stopped
  3. 3. CHI Dave Bolland stopped
  4. 4. STL Andy McDonald stopped
  5. 5. CHI Patrick Sharp stopped
  6. 6. STL David Perron stopped
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 6:34CHIJamal Mayers: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:34STLB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:31STLIan Cole: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 19:56STLRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 19:56CHIBrandon Bollig: Instigator2 min
  6. P1 19:56CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 19:56CHIBrandon Bollig: Misconduct10 min
  8. P2 8:04STLB.J. Crombeen: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 14:24STLDavid Backes: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P3 1:55STLKevin Shattenkirk: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P3 6:29STLBarret Jackman: Slashing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 8:16STLVladimir Sobotka: Boarding2 min
  13. P3 8:16STLJamie Langenbrunner: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 8:16CHIDylan Olsen: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← STL attackCHI attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCHI
24Shots on goal46
1.7Expected goals4.3
45Shot attempts86
32Faceoffs won26
1Power plays6
24Penalty minutes24
29Hits29
18Blocked shots12
4Giveaways11
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Backes – Oshie – Sobotka2:41

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Arnott – Langenbrunner – Sobotka6:23

    xG 0.16–0.30 (35%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  3. Nichol – Crombeen – Reaves2:28

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  4. McDonald – Berglund – Perron12:43

    xG 0.50–1.04 (33%)attempts 11–14goals 2–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Cole12:25

    xG 0.56–0.40 (58%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  2. Polak – Pietrangelo2:07

    xG 0.24–0.18 (56%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Polak2:14

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSharp – Stalberg – Kruger13:38

    xG 1.22–0.48 (72%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0

  2. Brunette – Hossa – Kane9:59

    xG 0.68–0.14 (82%)attempts 13–7goals 1–2

  3. Bolland – Bickell – Shaw9:13

    xG 0.27–0.16 (63%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Leddy12:29

    xG 1.08–0.47 (70%)attempts 14–12goals 2–1

  2. Keith – Seabrook15:07

    xG 0.91–0.32 (74%)attempts 21–11goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Leddy2:55

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.3 xGSTL 1.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #139 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.18 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 87% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).