Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 14, 2012·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Dallas Stars 2, Winnipeg Jets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 58% of the time.

WPG winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL0911318230
WPG11141205528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:21WPGNik AntropovAssists: Antti Miettinen, Grant Clitsome · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:19WPGEvander KaneAssists: Alexander Burmistrov, Kyle Wellwood · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:28WPGEric FehrGWGUnassisted · Slap, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 9:15WPGAndrew LaddAssists: Bryan Little, Blake Wheeler · Wrist, 0.23 xG0–4
  5. P2 16:12WPGAndrew LaddPPAssists: Dustin Byfuglien, Blake Wheeler · Deflected, 0.02 xG0–5
  6. P2 16:29DALLoui ErikssonAssists: Mike Ribeiro · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–5
  7. P3 16:16DALLoui ErikssonAssists: Michael Ryder, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P2 5:34DALVernon Fiddler: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 10:44DALMike Ribeiro: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P2 10:44WPGRon Hainsey: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 15:59DALStephane Robidas: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P3 17:13WPGTanner Glass: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 17:13DALAdam Burish: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 17:13DALVernon Fiddler: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 17:13WPGTanner Glass: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 17:13DALAdam Burish: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 17:13DALAdam Burish: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
45% to win55% to win
← DAL attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Slater won the faceoff against Ott
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALWPG
30Shots on goal28
2.0Expected goals2.4
52Shot attempts51
34Faceoffs won37
0Power plays3
30Penalty minutes14
36Hits27
13Blocked shots11
11Giveaways14
1Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestFiddler – Burish – Nystrom13:08

    xG 0.56–0.19 (75%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Ribeiro – Ryder – Eriksson13:21

    xG 0.50–0.52 (49%)attempts 11–13goals 2–0

  3. Morrow – Ott – Benn13:37

    xG 0.25–0.34 (42%)attempts 14–13goals 0–2

  4. Wandell – Vincour – Garbutt6:24

    xG 0.20–0.64 (24%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDaley – Goligoski4:21

    xG 0.48–0.27 (64%)attempts 8–3goals 1–1

  2. Goligoski – Larsen3:29

    xG 0.22–0.05 (83%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Robidas – Daley2:13

    xG 0.04–0.01 (80%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestLadd – Wheeler – Little12:21

    xG 0.84–0.54 (61%)attempts 19–10goals 1–1

  2. Antropov – Miettinen – Stapleton8:29

    xG 0.32–0.25 (56%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Slater – Fehr – Glass12:05

    xG 0.28–0.24 (54%)attempts 7–14goals 1–0

  4. Wellwood – Kane – Burmistrov10:55

    xG 0.35–0.35 (50%)attempts 9–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Byfuglien16:33

    xG 1.20–0.39 (75%)attempts 25–11goals 1–1

  2. Hainsey – Clitsome18:03

    xG 0.35–0.58 (38%)attempts 12–18goals 2–1

  3. Stuart – Jones13:07

    xG 0.32–0.57 (36%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 2.4 xGDAL 2.0 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #467 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.48 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 58% of the time.

WPG winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).