Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 17, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Carolina Hurricanes 5, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR18111315534
MIN14210012326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:02CARDrayson BowmanUnassisted · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:08MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Steven Kampfer, Tom Gilbert · Backhand, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:33MINNick JohnsonAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:24MINErik ChristensenPPAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Cal Clutterbuck · Tip-in, 0.18 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:14CARDrayson BowmanAssists: Brandon Sutter, Anthony Stewart · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:16CARBrandon SutterAssists: Drayson Bowman · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:04CARTim BrentGWGAssists: Eric Staal, Jiri Tlusty · Slap, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:45CARChad LaRoseENAssists: Jussi Jokinen · Backhand, 0.73 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:24MINNate Prosser: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:24CARBrandon Sutter: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 3:24CARPatrick Dwyer: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 3:24MINDany Heatley: Elbowing2 min
  5. P2 14:03CARJamie McBain: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:38CARTim Brent: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 6:03MINTom Gilbert: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← CAR attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cullen won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARMIN
34Shots on goal26
2.8Expected goals1.8
52Shot attempts52
23Faceoffs won32
1Power plays2
11Penalty minutes9
19Hits24
17Blocked shots9
3Giveaways8
0Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestLaRose – Staal – Tlusty7:40

    xG 1.16–0.04 (97%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  2. Ruutu – Staal – Tlusty5:26

    xG 0.12–0.02 (86%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  3. Ruutu – Sutter – Bowman2:21

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Dwyer – Nodl – Sutter5:16

    xG 0.04–0.03 (58%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGleason – McBain5:46

    xG 0.64–0.00 (100%)attempts 13–1goals 0–0

  2. Spacek – McBain9:04

    xG 0.63–0.30 (67%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Harrison – Faulk17:23

    xG 0.37–0.34 (52%)attempts 9–17goals 1–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Clutterbuck – Powe12:53

    xG 0.30–0.23 (56%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  2. Peters – Veilleux – Ortmeyer6:48

    xG 0.04–0.03 (61%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Christensen – Setoguchi – Palmieri7:44

    xG 0.06–0.16 (26%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  4. Heatley – Brodziak – Johnson16:08

    xG 0.38–1.29 (23%)attempts 10–18goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKampfer – Prosser10:45

    xG 0.34–0.17 (67%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  2. Gilbert – Kampfer2:53

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  3. Scandella – Spurgeon20:42

    xG 0.65–0.72 (47%)attempts 15–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.8 xGCAR 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #198 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.79 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).