Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 17, 2012·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Buffalo Sabres 2, Florida Panthers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 75% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF11011204001226
FLA2401201002317

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:15BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Drew Stafford, Marcus Foligno · Slap, 0.22 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:15FLAMikael SamuelssonPPAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Stephen Weiss · Slap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:53FLAJohn MaddenAssists: Ed Jovanovski, Erik Gudbranson · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:41BUFDerek RoyPPAssists: Jason Pominville · Slap, 0.35 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA John Madden stopped
  2. 2. BUF Thomas Vanek stopped
  3. 3. FLA Wojtek Wolski scored
  4. 4. BUF Tyler Ennis scored
  5. 5. FLA Mikael Samuelsson stopped
  6. 6. BUF Jason Pominville stopped
  7. 7. FLA Stephen Weiss stopped
  8. 8. BUF Cody Hodgson stopped
  9. 9. FLA Marcel Goc stopped
  10. 10. BUF Brad Boyes stopped
  11. 11. FLA Sean Bergenheim stopped
  12. 12. BUF Derek Roy stopped
  13. 13. FLA Dmitry Kulikov scored
  14. 14. BUF Drew Stafford stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:04BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:04FLAKris Versteeg: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 9:59FLATomas Fleischmann: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P1 10:30BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 15:43BUFAlexander Sulzer: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 9:16FLAShawn Matthias: Fighting5 min · PPG
  7. P2 9:16BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 9:16FLAShawn Matthias: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P2 14:20FLAJerred Smithson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Roy won the faceoff against Matthias
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFFLA
26Shots on goal17
2.3Expected goals1.1
45Shot attempts43
28Faceoffs won28
3Power plays2
14Penalty minutes16
34Hits43
16Blocked shots15
1Giveaways4
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestStafford – Ennis – Foligno13:40

    xG 0.72–0.12 (86%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Vanek – Leino – Hodgson12:13

    xG 0.59–0.12 (84%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  3. Roy – Pominville – Tropp13:19

    xG 0.41–0.37 (52%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  4. Boyes – McCormick – Kaleta7:17

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Weber11:35

    xG 0.51–0.09 (85%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Sulzer15:19

    xG 0.47–0.12 (79%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Regehr – Sekera16:32

    xG 0.60–0.47 (56%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestSturm – Madden – Smithson7:02

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Kopecky – Versteeg – Matthias2:49

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Weiss – Fleischmann – Wolski7:13

    xG 0.24–0.29 (46%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  4. Samuelsson – Goc – Bergenheim12:00

    xG 0.12–0.17 (41%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Weaver – Kulikov14:38

    xG 0.21–0.22 (50%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Campbell – Garrison19:03

    xG 0.38–0.62 (38%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

  3. Jovanovski – Gudbranson13:09

    xG 0.17–0.52 (24%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 1.1 xGBUF 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 48/100 · #607 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.53 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 75% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).