Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
43
Shoots
Left
Height
175 cm
Weight
83 kg
Born
Ottawa, CAN
Draft
2001, round 2, #32 (BUF)

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
384
Goals
81
Points
245
TOI per game
17:29
xGF% (5v5)
51.2%
Goals above expected
−5.3

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10BUF80264369+919:2321512.1%2223.5–
2010–11BUF35102535−119:328911.2%149.752.4%
2011–12BUF80172744−719:191769.7%1117.151.0%
2012–13DAL3041822+318:58656.2%67.050.6%
2012–13VAN12336+117:392015.0%22.154.9%
2012–13All teams4272128+418:36858.2%89.151.8%
2013–14STL7592837−113:371147.9%1613.555.5%
2014–15NSH261910013:31352.9%23.452.8%
2014–15EDM46111122−1316:547814.1%510.045.2%
2014–15All teams72122032−1315:4011310.6%713.447.3%
Total6 teams38481164245−917:2979210.2%7886.351.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.511.550100150200250300350
10m12m14m16m18m20m22m50100150200250300350Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

76th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd line
  • Goals /600.7259th pct
  • Assists /601.4791st pct
  • ixG /600.7764th pct
  • Goals above expected−5.322nd pct

Play-driving

2nd line
  • xGF% (5v5)51.2%67th pct
  • CF% (5v5)50.4%58th pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.771st pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1457th pct

Usage

1st line
  • TOI per game17:2985th pct
  • PP time share44.2%80th pct
  • Offensive zone starts59.3%58th pct
  • Quality of competition24.8%78th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Roy wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

48.1%

2450–2645 · #130 of 184 regulars, 30th percentile

Against an average centre

48.6%

Opponents won 50.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.5% against them.

Wins above average

−73

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

13.8

5,095 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

42%844 · +0.552%979 · +1.548%945 · +1.057%245 · +0.943%207 · +1.551%189 · +0.446%197 · −0.552%813 · +1.443%676 · +1.6Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone50.2% 961–952
  • Neutral zone45.8% 771–911
  • Defensive zone47.9% 718–782

By strength

  • Even strength46.8% 1812–2059
  • Power play54.9% 419–344
  • Shorthanded48.5% 207–220

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +16 after a win, −10 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–10121650.3%50.9%
2010–1152846.4%47.4%
2011–12132950.6%51.0%
2012–1364745.6%45.8%
2013–1446647.0%47.2%
2014–1590944.8%45.1%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−5.3 goals above expected

02040608010050100150200250300350Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120