Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 20, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Winnipeg Jets 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WPG21221008430
PIT21341527835

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:04PITTyler KennedyAssists: Sidney Crosby, Matt Cooke · Snap, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:35WPGJim SlaterAssists: Tanner Glass, Spencer Machacek · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:51WPGBryan LittlePPAssists: Andrew Ladd, Toby Enstrom · Snap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P1 16:44PITJames NealPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 1:15PITJames NealAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 3:54WPGBryan LittleAssists: Andrew Ladd, Toby Enstrom · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P2 6:55PITTyler KennedyAssists: Sidney Crosby, Matt Cooke · Snap, 0.16 xG3–4
  8. P2 11:31PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Paul Martin · Snap, 0.07 xG3–5
  9. P2 14:39WPGTim StapletonAssists: Ben Maxwell, Spencer Machacek · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–5
  10. P2 17:03PITJames NealAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Brooks Orpik · Snap, 0.05 xG4–6
  11. P3 2:07PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Chris Kunitz, James Neal · Backhand, 0.02 xG4–7
  12. P3 13:27PITPascal DupuisAssists: Jordan Staal, Steve Sullivan · Snap, 0.04 xG4–8
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 9:36WPGDustin Byfuglien: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 11:32PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:04WPGToby Enstrom: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P3 18:55WPGBryan Little: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← WPG attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Slater won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGPIT
30Shots on goal35
2.0Expected goals2.8
52Shot attempts70
31Faceoffs won42
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
26Hits25
19Blocked shots13
1Giveaways7
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestLadd – Wheeler – Little15:21

    xG 0.67–0.54 (55%)attempts 17–14goals 1–2

  2. Slater – Glass – Machacek4:00

    xG 0.19–0.09 (69%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Stapleton – Maxwell – Machacek3:31

    xG 0.19–0.19 (50%)attempts 1–3goals 1–0

  4. Miettinen – Stapleton – Maxwell2:33

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Byfuglien20:27

    xG 1.08–0.68 (61%)attempts 31–19goals 1–2

  2. Hainsey – Bogosian15:46

    xG 0.38–0.67 (36%)attempts 6–18goals 1–2

  3. Stuart – Clitsome12:03

    xG 0.13–0.67 (16%)attempts 9–10goals 0–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Kennedy – Crosby9:27

    xG 0.53–0.29 (65%)attempts 9–13goals 2–0

  2. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal12:16

    xG 0.83–0.59 (58%)attempts 18–12goals 3–1

  3. Sullivan – Dupuis – Staal13:00

    xG 0.49–0.47 (51%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

  4. Asham – Adams – Tangradi5:57

    xG 0.04–0.19 (16%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang17:18

    xG 1.11–0.80 (58%)attempts 23–14goals 2–2

  2. Orpik – Michalek16:37

    xG 0.49–0.39 (56%)attempts 11–18goals 2–0

  3. Engelland – Niskanen15:23

    xG 0.42–0.48 (46%)attempts 13–14goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.8 xGWPG 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #112 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.92 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).