Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 22, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Calgary Flames 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY1171903000229
MIN04112112021330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:54CGYLee StempniakPPAssists: Chris Butler, Jay Bouwmeester · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:38CGYAnton BabchukPPUnassisted · Slap, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:36MINDany HeatleyPPAssists: Devin Setoguchi, Matt Cullen · Slap, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 12:23MINDarroll PoweAssists: Nick Johnson, Kyle Brodziak · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Erik Christensen stopped
  2. 2. CGY Matt Stajan stopped
  3. 3. MIN Matt Cullen stopped
  4. 4. CGY Lee Stempniak stopped
  5. 5. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  6. 6. CGY Blair Jones stopped
  7. 7. MIN Devin Setoguchi scored
  8. 8. CGY Blake Comeau stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:28MINMikko Koivu: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 7:57CGYAlex Tanguay: Elbowing2 min
  3. P1 10:57MINClayton Stoner: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P1 16:59MINSteven Kampfer: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 0:25MINTom Gilbert: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P2 0:55MINNate Prosser: Closing hand on puck2 min
  7. P2 8:15CGYCurtis Glencross: Slashing2 min · PPG
  8. P2 12:38CGYJay Bouwmeester: Interference2 min
  9. P2 14:13CGYBlake Comeau: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 6:32CGYChris Butler: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 16:25CGYDavid Moss: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← CGY attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jokinen won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYMIN
29Shots on goal30
1.8Expected goals2.5
59Shot attempts67
30Faceoffs won32
6Power plays6
12Penalty minutes12
9Hits13
21Blocked shots13
6Giveaways10
3Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Moss – Glencross6:38

    xG 0.16–0.10 (62%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Kostopoulos – Jackman – Bouma5:32

    xG 0.09–0.13 (41%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Moss – Comeau – Jones2:31

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Iginla – Tanguay – Stajan10:00

    xG 0.29–0.37 (44%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Butler12:09

    xG 0.35–0.21 (62%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Bouwmeester – Giordano2:53

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Babchuk – Smith3:39

    xG 0.13–0.16 (44%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrodziak – Johnson – Powe8:14

    xG 0.51–0.09 (85%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Peters – Veilleux – Ortmeyer7:43

    xG 0.21–0.09 (70%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Heatley – Koivu – Setoguchi12:25

    xG 0.31–0.29 (52%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Christensen – Clutterbuck7:40

    xG 0.16–0.20 (44%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStoner – Prosser6:06

    xG 0.32–0.04 (88%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Gilbert – Prosser2:52

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Kampfer – Prosser4:14

    xG 0.19–0.11 (65%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.5 xGCGY 1.8 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #175 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.08 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).