Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 30, 2012·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Los Angeles Kings 4, Edmonton Oilers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 90% of the time.

EDM winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK2918115432
EDM120804114

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:52LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Dwight King, Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:34EDMJordan EberlePPAssists: Jeff Petry, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:48LAKMike RichardsSHGWGAssists: Willie Mitchell, Matt Greene · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:44LAKDrew DoughtyPPAssists: Justin Williams, Anze Kopitar · Deflected, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:45LAKAlec MartinezAssists: Matt Greene, Dwight King · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 1:09LAKMatt Greene: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:22EDMSam Gagner: Holding2 min
  3. P1 10:05LAKAnze Kopitar: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 18:25EDMRyan Jones: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 5:01EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:15LAKJustin Williams: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P2 15:36EDMAndy Sutton: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 1:22EDMAles Hemsky: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 5:12EDMCorey Potter: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 5:12LAKColin Fraser: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 16:14EDMRyan Smyth: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 16:14EDMRyan Smyth: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 16:14EDMDarcy Hordichuk: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 16:14LAKBrad Richardson: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← LAK attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKEDM
32Shots on goal14
4.1Expected goals1.3
76Shot attempts34
30Faceoffs won17
6Power plays3
10Penalty minutes26
19Hits23
8Blocked shots25
12Giveaways16
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Richards – King8:23

    xG 0.69–0.29 (71%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Brown – Kopitar – King2:41

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 2–0

  3. Stoll – Richardson – Lewis2:14

    xG 0.38–0.13 (75%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Penner – Lewis4:05

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Martinez10:54

    xG 1.23–0.20 (86%)attempts 18–3goals 1–0

  2. Mitchell – Voynov13:51

    xG 0.93–0.35 (73%)attempts 23–12goals 1–0

  3. Scuderi – Doughty12:40

    xG 0.40–0.43 (48%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins3:34

    xG 0.09–0.03 (73%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Hemsky – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins4:59

    xG 0.31–0.33 (49%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Smyth – Horcoff – Petrell5:18

    xG 0.04–0.16 (18%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Hordichuk – Eager – VandeVelde4:36

    xG 0.05–0.19 (20%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Smid – Petry5:16

    xG 0.02–0.08 (19%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1

  2. Sutton – Schultz2:54

    xG 0.05–0.20 (19%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

  3. Whitney – Potter3:28

    xG 0.15–0.32 (31%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 1.3 xGLAK 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 31/100 · #831 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.04 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 90% of the time.

EDM winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).