Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 3, 2012·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Toronto Maple Leafs 5, Buffalo Sabres 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
TOR313062600525
BUF0921931314645

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:13TORTyler BozakAssists: Matt Frattin, Phil Kessel · Snap, 0.44 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:49TORTyler BozakAssists: Phil Kessel, Luke Schenn · Slap, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P1 16:42TORMatt FrattinAssists: Tyler Bozak, Phil Kessel · Slap, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:26BUFTyler EnnisPPAssists: Alexander Sulzer, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 10:44BUFAlexander SulzerUnassisted · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:28TORClarke MacArthurAssists: Joey Crabb · Deflected, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 2:24BUFDerek RoyPPAssists: Cody Hodgson, Jason Pominville · Slap, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 10:39TORJake GardinerAssists: Tim Connolly, Joe Colborne · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–3
  9. P3 14:57BUFAlexander SulzerAssists: Thomas Vanek, Brayden McNabb · Slap, 0.38 xG5–4
  10. P3 18:07BUFJordan LeopoldAssists: Tyler Ennis, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.42 xG5–5
  11. OT 3:29BUFDerek RoyPPGWGAssists: Thomas Vanek, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:40BUFBrayden McNabb: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 4:40TORJay Rosehill: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:43BUFMarcus Foligno: Interference2 min
  4. P1 7:43TORMatt Frattin: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 7:43BUFMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 2:40TORJoey Crabb: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 5:09TORJoe Colborne: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 1:43TORBen Scrivens: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 12:40TORMatt Frattin: High sticking2 min
  10. OT 1:52TORDion Phaneuf: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← TOR attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Colborne
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORBUF
25Shots on goal45
2.5Expected goals3.8
41Shot attempts66
28Faceoffs won38
1Power plays5
20Penalty minutes12
13Hits14
15Blocked shots8
10Giveaways7
2Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Frattin – Bozak15:01

    xG 1.44–0.19 (88%)attempts 17–8goals 3–0

  2. Connolly – Lombardi – Brown9:13

    xG 0.18–0.19 (49%)attempts 2–10goals 1–0

  3. Crabb – MacArthur – Colborne11:32

    xG 0.25–0.59 (29%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLiles – Komisarek2:19

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Liles – Franson16:14

    xG 0.52–0.43 (55%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Gardiner14:04

    xG 0.46–0.52 (47%)attempts 8–16goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestStafford – Ennis – Foligno12:49

    xG 1.40–0.32 (82%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

  2. Vanek – Tropp – Hodgson9:42

    xG 0.41–0.25 (63%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. McCormick – Kaleta – Gerbe2:42

    xG 0.14–0.13 (52%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Stafford – Gerbe – Ennis2:23

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Sulzer15:23

    xG 1.44–0.56 (72%)attempts 13–11goals 2–2

  2. Weber – McNabb10:53

    xG 0.59–0.03 (95%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – McNabb2:25

    xG 0.09–0.07 (58%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.8 xGTOR 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #2 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.62 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).