Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 5, 2012·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 2, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 71% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN11209113234
CGY0308317328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:36VANAlexandre BurrowsSHAssists: Dan Hamhuis · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P3 1:27CGYMichael CammalleriAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, Akim Aliu · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 9:02CGYCurtis GlencrossUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 16:23CGYMichael CammalleriGWGAssists: Lee Stempniak, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:49VANJannik HansenAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:25VANSamuel Pahlsson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:39CGYTim Jackman: Holding2 min
  3. P1 12:16CGYLance Bouma: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 6:59VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 8:59VANMaxim Lapierre: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 9:31CGYMark Giordano: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 16:39CGYJarome Iginla: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 18:40CGYMatt Stajan: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 7:26VANMaxim Lapierre: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 7:26CGYAkim Aliu: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 10:44VANKevin Bieksa: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 11:40CGYCurtis Glencross: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 11:40VANSamuel Pahlsson: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 18:26CGYBlake Comeau: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stajan won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
34Shots on goal28
2.1Expected goals3.2
57Shot attempts40
28Faceoffs won26
6Power plays4
12Penalty minutes16
13Hits23
9Blocked shots11
10Giveaways16
2Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPahlsson – Higgins – Hansen6:36

    xG 0.46–0.31 (60%)attempts 10–3goals 1–1

  2. Kesler – Bitz – Booth8:05

    xG 0.12–0.22 (35%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Raymond – Ebbett – Weise5:07

    xG 0.03–0.22 (11%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Burrows – Lapierre9:02

    xG 0.17–1.15 (13%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Rome7:35

    xG 0.24–0.04 (86%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Bieksa14:13

    xG 0.48–0.35 (58%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  3. Rome – Edler2:09

    xG 0.00–0.22 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestStempniak – Comeau – Jones6:23

    xG 0.23–0.06 (78%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  2. Cammalleri – Stajan – Aliu6:56

    xG 0.39–0.25 (62%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Iginla – Jokinen – Glencross7:54

    xG 0.19–0.20 (48%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Kostopoulos – Jackman – Bouma5:57

    xG 0.06–0.23 (21%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSarich – Giordano12:45

    xG 1.48–0.12 (93%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Hannan – Babchuk7:50

    xG 0.22–0.24 (48%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Butler11:08

    xG 0.38–0.49 (44%)attempts 6–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.2 xGVAN 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 45/100 · #645 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.43 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 71% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).