Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 19, 2013·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 2, Minnesota Wild 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 88% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11205110227
MIN05318112435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:07COLJohn MitchellAssists: Steve Downie, Milan Hejduk · Wrist, 0.50 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:26MINDany HeatleyPPAssists: Zach Parise, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.50 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:19MINMikael GranlundAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Devin Setoguchi · Tip-in, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:01MINDany HeatleyPPGWGAssists: Zach Parise, Mikko Koivu · Deflected, 0.39 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:09COLCody McLeodAssists: Mark Olver, Greg Zanon · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:25MINPierre-Marc BouchardAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, Kyle Brodziak · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:28MINZenon Konopka: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:28COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 2:28MINZenon Konopka: Interference2 min
  4. P1 9:05MINRyan Suter: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 2:17COLSteve Downie: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 6:22COLSteve Downie: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 6:22COLSteve Downie: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 8:25COLRyan O'Byrne: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  9. P2 13:27MINCal Clutterbuck: Holding2 min
  10. P2 17:15COLJan Hejda: High sticking double minor4 min
  11. P3 10:46COLJohn Mitchell: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
43% to win57% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
27Shots on goal35
1.9Expected goals4.4
53Shot attempts54
27Faceoffs won32
3Power plays7
19Penalty minutes11
26Hits19
10Blocked shots18
5Giveaways9
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestHejduk – Mitchell – Downie6:54

    xG 0.71–0.36 (66%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

  2. Jones – Stastny – McGinn9:22

    xG 0.25–0.32 (44%)attempts 14–9goals 0–2

  3. Parenteau – Duchene – Landeskog10:36

    xG 0.14–0.32 (30%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Byrne – Hejda11:47

    xG 0.75–0.14 (84%)attempts 12–5goals 1–1

  2. Zanon – Wilson2:12

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Wilson11:18

    xG 0.28–0.34 (46%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBouchard – Brodziak – Clutterbuck6:09

    xG 0.28–0.06 (83%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Setoguchi – Granlund7:43

    xG 0.42–0.29 (59%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Konopka – Mitchell – Powe3:22

    xG 0.04–0.03 (54%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Heatley – Koivu – Parise11:26

    xG 0.35–0.76 (32%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFalk – Prosser10:40

    xG 0.39–0.07 (85%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  2. Gilbert – Stoner12:19

    xG 0.41–0.24 (63%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon15:28

    xG 0.60–1.05 (36%)attempts 17–22goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 4.4 xGCOL 1.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 47/100 · #382 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.41 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 88% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).