Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 24, 2013·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Buffalo Sabres 3, Carolina Hurricanes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 66% of the time.

CAR winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF06217110333
CAR07421210638

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:02CARJeff SkinnerAssists: Jordan Staal, Zac Dalpe · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:06CARJustin FaulkSHAssists: Jordan Staal · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:50BUFCody HodgsonAssists: Jordan Leopold, Thomas Vanek · Backhand, 0.30 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:39BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Alexander Sulzer · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:56CARJeff SkinnerUnassisted · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:05CAREric StaalGWGAssists: Jamie McBain, Joni Pitkanen · Backhand, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:06BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Thomas Vanek, Robyn Regehr · Snap, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:26CAREric StaalAssists: Joni Pitkanen · Snap, 0.10 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:32CAREric StaalENAssists: Zac Dalpe · Snap, 0.58 xG3–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:07CARJeff Skinner: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 4:03BUFAlexander Sulzer: Holding2 min
  3. P1 9:23CARDrayson Bowman: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 14:13BUFTyler Myers: Holding2 min
  5. P1 16:14CAREric Staal: Interference2 min
  6. P2 3:07CARPatrick Dwyer: Interference2 min
  7. P2 4:49BUFTyler Myers: Interference2 min
  8. P2 18:43CARChad LaRose: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 10:33BUFAlexander Sulzer: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 12:44CARJordan Staal: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCAR
33Shots on goal38
2.8Expected goals3.7
63Shot attempts60
24Faceoffs won31
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
26Hits27
13Blocked shots19
5Giveaways5
5Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Vanek – Hodgson9:04

    xG 0.97–0.29 (77%)attempts 15–10goals 3–1

  2. Hecht – Kaleta – Scott3:38

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Stafford – Ennis – Foligno9:06

    xG 0.60–0.47 (56%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  4. Ott – Gerbe – Grigorenko6:01

    xG 0.00–0.43 (0%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Sulzer9:48

    xG 1.01–0.42 (70%)attempts 18–9goals 1–1

  2. Regehr – Myers7:02

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Sekera2:33

    xG 0.09–0.17 (36%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestSemin – Staal – Tlusty10:09

    xG 0.61–0.40 (61%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  2. Staal – Dalpe – Skinner6:06

    xG 0.42–0.60 (41%)attempts 8–7goals 2–2

  3. Jokinen – LaRose – Bowman7:29

    xG 0.12–0.60 (17%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Harrison – Sanguinetti12:09

    xG 0.25–0.21 (54%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Pitkanen – McBain14:03

    xG 0.79–0.76 (51%)attempts 13–16goals 2–0

  3. Gleason – Faulk10:49

    xG 0.52–1.16 (31%)attempts 13–17goals 2–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.7 xGBUF 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #81 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.98 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 66% of the time.

CAR winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).