Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 25, 2013·Honda Center, Anaheim

Vancouver Canucks 5, Anaheim Ducks 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 78% of the time.

ANA winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN21318213534
ANA01109010030

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:13VANDaniel SedinPPGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Snap, 0.34 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:40VANMason RaymondPPAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Dan Hamhuis · Tip-in, 0.30 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:37VANAaron VolpattiUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–0
  4. P3 1:18VANZack KassianPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–0
  5. P3 15:01VANMason RaymondAssists: Jordan Schroeder · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–0
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 1:51VANAaron Volpatti: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 1:51ANAMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 8:11ANADaniel Winnik: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 8:42ANARyan Getzlaf: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 17:01ANABryan Allen: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 3:32VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 5:42ANALuca Sbisa: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  8. P2 12:36ANANick Bonino: Holding2 min
  9. P2 18:44ANACorey Perry: Charging2 min
  10. P2 18:44ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 3:33VANKevin Bieksa: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 3:33ANAMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 3:33ANAMatt Beleskey: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 12:22VANKeith Ballard: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 12:22ANACorey Perry: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 14:18VANDan Hamhuis: Tripping2 min
  17. P3 16:51ANAFrancois Beauchemin: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← VAN attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Burrows
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANANA
34Shots on goal30
3.9Expected goals2.1
58Shot attempts48
36Faceoffs won32
9Power plays2
16Penalty minutes31
29Hits29
10Blocked shots10
10Giveaways9
1Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestLapierre – Ebbett – Volpatti4:37

    xG 0.17–0.10 (63%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Higgins – Lapierre – Hansen2:19

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Raymond – Weise – Schroeder6:48

    xG 0.05–0.34 (14%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Higgins – Burrows – Hansen7:28

    xG 0.09–0.47 (15%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBallard – Tanev10:29

    xG 0.39–0.14 (73%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0

  2. Edler – Garrison10:22

    xG 0.27–0.29 (48%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Bieksa10:57

    xG 0.16–0.64 (20%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Palmieri11:34

    xG 0.61–0.10 (86%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Winnik – Cogliano6:59

    xG 0.48–0.28 (63%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Selanne – Ryan – Bonino9:38

    xG 0.51–0.32 (62%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  4. Beleskey – Holland – Smith-Pelly3:53

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLydman – Beauchemin12:18

    xG 0.51–0.15 (77%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  2. Allen – Fowler13:28

    xG 0.71–0.52 (58%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

  3. Souray – Sbisa11:49

    xG 0.43–0.28 (61%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.1 xGVAN 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 11/100 · #662 of 720 this seasonSwing 0.83 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 78% of the time.

ANA winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).