Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 14, 2013·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 4, Minnesota Wild 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL05215111012432
MIN0111827030329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:38COLAaron PalushajAssists: David Jones, Paul Stastny · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 8:52MINZach PariseAssists: Mikko Koivu, Dany Heatley · Wrap-around, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:26COLMilan HejdukPPAssists: Jamie McGinn, Tyson Barrie · Snap, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:30MINMike RuppAssists: Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.41 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:56MINMikko KoivuAssists: Dany Heatley, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:42COLMatt DucheneAssists: PA Parenteau, Shane O'Brien · Wrap-around, 0.02 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Zach Parise stopped
  2. 2. COL Milan Hejduk scored
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  4. 4. COL Matt Duchene scored
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 10:14COLPatrick Bordeleau: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 16:23MINZenon Konopka: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P3 18:53MINZach Parise: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
43% to win57% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
32Shots on goal29
2.6Expected goals1.9
51Shot attempts51
29Faceoffs won39
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
26Hits24
17Blocked shots9
4Giveaways9
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestParenteau – McGinn – Duchene16:23

    xG 0.75–0.28 (73%)attempts 17–16goals 1–1

  2. Jones – Stastny – Palushaj9:43

    xG 0.51–0.25 (68%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Hejduk – Mitchell – McLeod10:35

    xG 0.26–0.06 (82%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  4. Kobasew – Bordeleau – Olver5:53

    xG 0.09–0.68 (11%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Barrie19:10

    xG 0.88–0.37 (70%)attempts 18–17goals 1–1

  2. O'Byrne – O'Brien16:32

    xG 0.60–0.39 (61%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  3. Zanon – Hunwick13:09

    xG 0.19–0.88 (18%)attempts 7–12goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Koivu – Parise16:38

    xG 0.93–0.56 (62%)attempts 27–14goals 2–0

  2. Rupp – Konopka – Mitchell4:46

    xG 0.09–0.06 (60%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Bouchard – Mitchell4:07

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Rupp – Bouchard3:34

    xG 0.05–0.10 (33%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFalk – Spurgeon13:50

    xG 0.90–0.62 (59%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Brodin16:42

    xG 0.57–0.48 (54%)attempts 19–13goals 1–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon3:18

    xG 0.10–0.07 (59%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.9 xGCOL 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #90 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.42 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).