Tue, Feb 19, 2013·First Niagara Center, Buffalo
Winnipeg Jets 2, Buffalo Sabres 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 56% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 19 | 114 | 05 | 228 |
| BUF | 09 | 110 | 011 | 130 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 1:00WPGBryan LittleAssists: Evander Kane, James Wright · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
- P2 5:46WPGAndrew LaddGWGAssists: Ron Hainsey · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
- P2 19:38BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Cody Hodgson · Slap, 0.07 xG2–1
Penalties (6)
- P1 2:36BUFJohn Scott: Slashing2 min
- P1 10:21WPGEvander Kane: Slashing2 min
- P1 10:21BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min
- P1 10:21WPGEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
- P1 18:16WPGDustin Byfuglien: Hooking2 min
- P3 16:01WPGEvander Kane: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Jokinen
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestLadd – Wheeler – Little11:29
xG 0.79–0.57 (58%)attempts 17–9goals 1–0
- Jokinen – Wellwood – Tangradi7:29
xG 0.31–0.33 (48%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
- Antropov – Slater – Kane2:54
xG 0.01–0.04 (18%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0
- Jokinen – Tangradi – Wright2:28
xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHainsey – Bogosian16:56
xG 0.70–0.22 (76%)attempts 17–13goals 1–0
- Stuart – Postma11:56
xG 0.49–0.38 (56%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0
- Byfuglien – Clitsome16:01
xG 0.57–1.26 (31%)attempts 13–17goals 1–0
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestStafford – Ennis – Foligno9:51
xG 0.27–0.03 (91%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0
- Pominville – Vanek – Hodgson12:51
xG 0.86–0.66 (57%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1
- Hecht – Ott – Gerbe9:36
xG 0.43–0.27 (62%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0
- McCormick – Kaleta – Scott2:58
xG 0.04–0.03 (56%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestBrennan – Myers2:24
xG 0.17–0.05 (77%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0
- Ehrhoff – Sulzer20:59
xG 1.04–1.02 (50%)attempts 23–24goals 0–1
- Regehr – Myers11:31
xG 0.18–0.25 (42%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 56% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BUF − WPG), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).