Sat, Feb 23, 2013·Scotiabank Place, Ottawa
Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Ottawa Senators 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 60% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 18 | 011 | 19 | 228 |
| OTT | 114 | 110 | 111 | 335 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 3:32TORMikhail GrabovskiAssists: Nikolay Kulemin, Jay McClement · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
- P1 10:52OTTMika ZibanejadAssists: Colin Greening, Erik Condra · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–1
- P2 19:17OTTErik CondraAssists: Eric Gryba, Colin Greening · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–2
- P3 7:10TORClarke MacArthurPPAssists: Michael Kostka, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.29 xG2–2
- P3 19:36OTTColin GreeningGWGAssists: Patrick Wiercioch, Mika Zibanejad · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–3
Penalties (3)
- P2 6:25TORNikolay Kulemin: Tripping2 min
- P3 5:33OTTEric Gryba: Holding2 min · PPG
- P3 14:08OTTChris Neil: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Turris won the faceoff against Grabovski
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forward lines
- bestMacArthur – Komarov – Kadri12:45
xG 0.66–0.24 (73%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0
- Steckel – Brown – McLaren3:56
xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Kessel – van Riemsdyk – Bozak15:29
xG 0.31–0.74 (29%)attempts 12–22goals 0–0
- McClement – Grabovski – Kulemin13:06
xG 0.34–1.23 (22%)attempts 10–17goals 1–3
Defence pairs
- bestFranson – Fraser14:50
xG 0.63–0.19 (77%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0
- Gunnarsson – Kostka13:13
xG 0.36–0.64 (36%)attempts 14–12goals 0–2
- Phaneuf – Holzer17:55
xG 0.53–1.30 (29%)attempts 13–26goals 1–1
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestGreening – Condra – Zibanejad8:54
xG 1.09–0.29 (79%)attempts 14–5goals 3–0
- Neil – Smith – Dziurzynski11:46
xG 0.97–0.47 (67%)attempts 18–12goals 0–0
- Daugavins – O'Brien – Grant6:43
xG 0.04–0.07 (35%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0
- Alfredsson – Turris – Silfverberg15:32
xG 0.50–0.60 (45%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestMethot – Gryba19:03
xG 1.43–0.40 (78%)attempts 23–17goals 1–0
- Gonchar – Wiercioch15:13
xG 0.66–0.66 (50%)attempts 17–13goals 1–1
- Phillips – Benoit13:51
xG 0.25–0.42 (38%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 60% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (OTT − TOR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).