Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 25, 2013·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Dallas Stars 4, Nashville Predators 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 56% of the time.

NSH winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
DAL064130500424
NSH1821011211531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:43NSHCraig SmithAssists: Rich Clune, Sergei Kostitsyn · Snap, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:20DALMatt FraserAssists: Loui Eriksson, Jordie Benn · Slap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:45DALReilly SmithAssists: Michael Ryder, Cody Eakin · Tip-in, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:05NSHRoman JosiAssists: David Legwand, Patric Hornqvist · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:29DALVernon FiddlerPPAssists: Jamie Benn, Michael Ryder · Slap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:21DALLoui ErikssonPPAssists: Michael Ryder, Stephane Robidas · Tip-in, 0.23 xG4–2
  7. P2 13:43NSHPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Martin Erat, Roman Josi · Backhand, 0.22 xG4–3
  8. P3 8:22NSHMike FisherAssists: Colin Wilson, Roman Josi · Backhand, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:28NSHRoman JosiGWGAssists: Sergei Kostitsyn, Shea Weber · Slap, 0.04 xG4–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 15:29DALLoui Eriksson: Interference2 min
  2. P2 5:41NSHMartin Erat: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:29NSHMike Fisher: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P2 11:45NSHBrandon Yip: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 11:45DALEric Nystrom: Fighting5 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:45DALEric Nystrom: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 12:24DALVernon Fiddler: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 12:24NSHMike Fisher: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 12:24DALVernon Fiddler: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:14DALMatt Fraser: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 3:22NSHPatric Hornqvist: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
43% to win57% to win
← DAL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Legwand won the faceoff against Roy
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALNSH
24Shots on goal31
2.2Expected goals2.4
53Shot attempts46
26Faceoffs won31
4Power plays4
15Penalty minutes15
15Hits28
10Blocked shots20
5Giveaways6
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRyder – Smith – Eakin8:40

    xG 0.51–0.05 (91%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Jagr – Morrow – Benn12:14

    xG 0.50–0.42 (55%)attempts 9–10goals 0–2

  3. Fiddler – Nystrom – Garbutt6:44

    xG 0.36–0.39 (48%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  4. Roy – Eriksson – Fraser7:41

    xG 0.13–0.42 (24%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDaley – Benn12:31

    xG 0.42–0.31 (57%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

  2. Robidas – Dillon14:23

    xG 0.24–0.30 (45%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Oleksiak11:32

    xG 0.70–0.76 (48%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Bourque6:59

    xG 0.31–0.10 (75%)attempts 9–4goals 1–1

  2. Clune – Kostitsyn – Smith8:23

    xG 0.65–0.60 (52%)attempts 5–11goals 1–1

  3. Fisher – Erat – Wilson10:37

    xG 0.25–0.32 (44%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  4. Yip – Halischuk – Spaling7:13

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Ellis9:13

    xG 0.63–0.35 (65%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  2. Blum – Ellis2:15

    xG 0.09–0.17 (35%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Josi16:51

    xG 0.28–0.39 (42%)attempts 9–12goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.4 xGDAL 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #24 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.61 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 56% of the time.

NSH winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).