Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 2, 2013·Jobing.com Arena, Glendale

Anaheim Ducks 4, Phoenix Coyotes 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 53% of the time.

PHX winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA11421117030435
PHX1818217041537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:21ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Saku Koivu, Toni Lydman · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:30PHXMatthew LombardiAssists: Raffi Torres, Shane Doan · Backhand, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:32PHXLauri KorpikoskiAssists: David Moss, Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:59ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Ben Lovejoy · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:26ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Daniel Winnik, Saku Koivu · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:16PHXLauri KorpikoskiAssists: Antoine Vermette · Backhand, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:25ANASaku KoivuPPAssists: Bobby Ryan, Luca Sbisa · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–3
  8. P3 13:31PHXSteve SullivanAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Mikkel Boedker · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
  2. 2. ANA Nick Bonino stopped
  3. 3. PHX Steve Sullivan scored
  4. 4. ANA Corey Perry stopped
  5. 5. PHX Lauri Korpikoski stopped
  6. 6. ANA Saku Koivu stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:00PHXDerek Morris: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:38PHXKyle Chipchura: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:38ANASaku Koivu: Roughing2 min
  4. P3 4:28PHXKyle Chipchura: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  5. OT 3:02PHXAntoine Vermette: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHX
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackPHX attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Vermette
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAPHX
35Shots on goal37
2.9Expected goals3.0
58Shot attempts81
26Faceoffs won36
3Power plays0
2Penalty minutes8
27Hits26
27Blocked shots13
2Giveaways2
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Winnik – Cogliano9:48

    xG 0.45–0.15 (75%)attempts 8–5goals 2–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Palmieri2:43

    xG 0.05–0.02 (73%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Selanne – Ryan – Bonino3:57

    xG 0.03–0.01 (79%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Getzlaf – Maroon – Etem2:02

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Souray – Beauchemin17:37

    xG 0.15–0.50 (24%)attempts 8–17goals 1–1

  2. Lydman – Lovejoy14:37

    xG 0.64–1.02 (39%)attempts 18–17goals 2–2

  3. Sbisa – Fowler15:27

    xG 0.26–0.97 (21%)attempts 7–28goals 0–1

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestSullivan – Chipchura – Boedker5:29

    xG 0.82–0.31 (73%)attempts 17–4goals 1–0

  2. Doan – Torres – Lombardi15:14

    xG 0.73–0.27 (73%)attempts 22–9goals 1–1

  3. Vermette – Moss – Korpikoski3:44

    xG 0.28–0.13 (68%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  4. Bissonnette – Chipchura – Johnson5:05

    xG 0.11–0.06 (64%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Ekman-Larsson17:41

    xG 0.98–0.25 (80%)attempts 23–8goals 2–0

  2. Yandle – Stone5:30

    xG 0.71–0.35 (67%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Klesla – Stone11:38

    xG 0.40–0.14 (74%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHX 3.0 xGANA 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHXANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHX's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHX is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #39 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.77 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50PHX 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 53% of the time.

PHX winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHX − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).