Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 19, 2013·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Florida Panthers 4, Carolina Hurricanes 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 84% of the time.

CAR winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA017011416444
CAR01705112134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P3 7:39FLATomas FleischmannAssists: Tomas Kopecky · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–0
  2. P3 12:47FLAMarcel GocPPGWGAssists: Filip Kuba, Brian Campbell · Deflected, 0.27 xG2–0
  3. P3 13:51FLAShawn MatthiasPPAssists: Filip Kuba, Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.47 xG3–0
  4. P3 17:27CARJordan StaalPPAssists: Joni Pitkanen, Dan Ellis · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 19:07FLAJerred SmithsonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.79 xG4–1
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:11FLAPeter Mueller: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 11:37FLAScottie Upshall: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P2 17:18FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Diving2 min
  4. P2 17:18CARJay Harrison: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 17:21CARJordan Staal: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 11:50CARJamie McBain: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 12:15CARJay Harrison: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  8. P3 17:02CARKevin Westgarth: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 17:02FLAEric Selleck: Fighting5 min · PPG
  10. P3 17:02FLAEric Selleck: Instigator2 min
  11. P3 17:02FLAEric Selleck: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Shore won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACAR
44Shots on goal34
5.9Expected goals3.2
73Shot attempts71
31Faceoffs won32
3Power plays4
25Penalty minutes13
25Hits27
19Blocked shots11
4Giveaways11
13Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestKopecky – Goc – Fleischmann10:25

    xG 0.86–0.16 (85%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Upshall – Skille – Matthias7:51

    xG 0.41–0.21 (66%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Mueller – Shore – Huberdeau10:47

    xG 0.96–0.94 (51%)attempts 16–19goals 0–0

  4. Smithson – Santorelli – Selleck6:18

    xG 0.20–0.30 (39%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKuba – Gudbranson13:38

    xG 1.12–0.65 (63%)attempts 21–14goals 0–0

  2. Campbell – Strachan18:49

    xG 1.33–0.89 (60%)attempts 21–20goals 1–0

  3. Brennan – Robak11:15

    xG 0.75–0.75 (50%)attempts 9–21goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestSemin – Staal – Tlusty11:00

    xG 1.08–0.59 (64%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  2. Hall – Brent – Westgarth4:20

    xG 0.27–0.28 (49%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Jokinen – Nash – Bowman7:30

    xG 0.07–0.22 (23%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  4. Dwyer – Staal – Skinner11:12

    xG 0.30–1.39 (18%)attempts 11–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarrison – McBain3:39

    xG 0.57–0.06 (90%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Gleason – Sanguinetti9:37

    xG 0.80–0.69 (54%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

  3. Gleason – Harrison5:38

    xG 0.21–0.27 (43%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.2 xGFLA 5.9 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #542 of 720 this seasonSwing 0.87 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 84% of the time.

CAR winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).