Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 28, 2013·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Buffalo Sabres 4, Florida Panthers 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF07314116031440
FLA112113213022540

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:28FLAShawn MatthiasAssists: Tyson Strachan, Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:43FLATomas FleischmannPPAssists: Tomas Kopecky, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:36BUFNathan GerbeAssists: Tyler Ennis, Drew Stafford · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:56BUFAndrej SekeraAssists: Steve Ott · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:04BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Robyn Regehr · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:23FLAShawn MatthiasAssists: Peter Mueller · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 11:33BUFMarcus FolignoPPAssists: Jordan Leopold, Tyler Myers · Tip-in, 0.16 xG4–3
  8. P3 13:51FLAJonathan HuberdeauPPAssists: Peter Mueller, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Jason Pominville scored
  2. 2. FLA Peter Mueller stopped
  3. 3. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  4. 4. FLA Jonathan Huberdeau scored
  5. 5. BUF Drew Stafford stopped
  6. 6. FLA Shawn Matthias stopped
  7. 7. BUF Steve Ott stopped
  8. 8. FLA Mike Santorelli scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:35BUFCody Hodgson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:20BUFVille Leino: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  3. P2 4:46BUFPatrick Kaleta: Charging2 min
  4. P2 4:46FLAErik Gudbranson: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 4:46BUFJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 6:42FLAShawn Matthias: Interference2 min
  7. P2 11:34BUFJordan Leopold: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 2:59FLAShawn Matthias: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 9:52FLADmitry Kulikov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  10. P3 12:37BUFSteve Ott: Tripping2 min · PPG
  11. P3 16:33FLADrew Shore: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthias won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFFLA
40Shots on goal40
2.8Expected goals3.0
58Shot attempts60
27Faceoffs won35
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
27Hits15
8Blocked shots6
1Giveaways3
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Pominville – Hodgson10:35

    xG 0.70–0.31 (70%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Porter – Gerbe – Foligno2:39

    xG 0.14–0.07 (67%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Stafford – Leino – Ennis4:56

    xG 0.40–0.34 (54%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  4. Hecht – Kaleta – Scott4:32

    xG 0.06–0.11 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Sekera12:27

    xG 0.84–0.42 (66%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Sekera2:02

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Weber11:26

    xG 0.45–0.34 (57%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestMueller – Matthias – Huberdeau8:39

    xG 0.76–0.33 (70%)attempts 13–7goals 2–1

  2. Smithson – Rallo – Howden5:33

    xG 0.11–0.09 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Upshall – Santorelli – Shore7:19

    xG 0.17–0.34 (33%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Kopecky – Goc – Fleischmann11:15

    xG 0.26–0.52 (33%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKuba – Strachan2:29

    xG 0.20–0.04 (83%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

  2. Kuba – Kulikov7:37

    xG 0.27–0.23 (54%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  3. Brennan – Gudbranson10:18

    xG 0.30–0.28 (52%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.0 xGBUF 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #23 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.87 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).