Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 12, 2013·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Dallas Stars 5, Nashville Predators 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 50% of the time.

NSH winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL252617518
NSH1609113228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:04DALErik ColeAssists: Vernon Fiddler, Philip Larsen · Slap, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:40DALRay WhitneyPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Vernon Fiddler · Slap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:42NSHTaylor BeckPPAssists: Roman Josi, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 2:28DALTom WandellGWGAssists: Ryan Garbutt, Antoine Roussel · Tip-in, 0.22 xG3–1
  5. P2 11:12DALAlex ChiassonAssists: Ray Whitney, Trevor Daley · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–1
  6. P3 7:03DALAlex ChiassonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–1
  7. P3 12:12NSHBobby ButlerAssists: Daniel Bang, Victor Bartley · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 6:59NSHCraig Smith: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:55NSHNick Spaling: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 16:05DALAntoine Roussel: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:05NSHRich Clune: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:54DALBrenden Dillon: Interference2 min
  6. P2 7:11DALEric Nystrom: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 15:37DALStephane Robidas: Holding2 min
  8. P3 16:31NSHSergei Kostitsyn: Boarding5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
43% to win57% to win
← DAL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fiddler won the faceoff against Spaling
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALNSH
18Shots on goal28
2.2Expected goals2.2
31Shot attempts55
26Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes14
20Hits26
18Blocked shots5
7Giveaways3
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestWhitney – Benn – Chiasson11:17

    xG 0.56–0.33 (63%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  2. Wandell – Roussel – Garbutt6:27

    xG 0.28–0.19 (59%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1

  3. Cole – Fiddler – Nystrom10:16

    xG 0.15–0.12 (55%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  4. Eriksson – Eakin – Fraser10:45

    xG 0.08–0.18 (31%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Robidas – Daley14:05

    xG 0.42–0.40 (51%)attempts 8–12goals 2–0

  2. Goligoski – Dillon17:46

    xG 0.49–0.52 (48%)attempts 8–17goals 1–0

  3. Rome – Larsen13:17

    xG 0.14–0.36 (29%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestKostitsyn – Spaling – Smith4:15

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Legwand – Hornqvist – Beck11:40

    xG 0.39–0.14 (73%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  3. Kostitsyn – Halischuk – Spaling5:22

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Clune – Halischuk – Mueller6:12

    xG 0.14–0.20 (41%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGill – Klein3:35

    xG 0.27–0.01 (95%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Josi15:50

    xG 0.39–0.21 (65%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  3. Bartley – Blum4:15

    xG 0.16–0.06 (74%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.2 xGDAL 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #420 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 50% of the time.

NSH winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).