Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 17, 2013·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Montréal Canadiens 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

PIT winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL011211213435
PIT3928112629

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:24PITBrandon SutterAssists: Matt Niskanen, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:30PITBrenden MorrowAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Craig Adams · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:39PITJarome IginlaPPAssists: Chris Kunitz, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:07PITBrenden MorrowAssists: Beau Bennett, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 7:42MTLBrian GiontaAssists: Brandon Prust, Lars Eller · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P2 10:30PITBrandon SutterPPGWGAssists: Brenden Morrow, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.39 xG1–5
  7. P2 17:35MTLAlex GalchenyukAssists: Lars Eller, Travis Moen · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–5
  8. P3 4:09MTLGabriel DumontAssists: David Desharnais, Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–5
  9. P3 5:24PITDouglas MurrayAssists: Jarome Iginla · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–6
  10. P3 19:49MTLAndrei MarkovAssists: David Desharnais, Yannick Weber · Backhand, 0.29 xG4–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 5:36PITMatt Cooke: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 6:38MTLBrendan Gallagher: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 18:22MTLMax Pacioretty: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 1:25PITTyler Kennedy: Interference2 min
  5. P2 9:38MTLBrendan Gallagher: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 14:58PITTanner Glass: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 19:29MTLBrendan Gallagher: High sticking double minor4 min
  8. P3 7:05MTLP.K. Subban: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 7:05PITBrenden Morrow: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 7:05MTLRene Bourque: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 14:54PITBrenden Morrow: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 14:54MTLBrandon Prust: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 15:28MTLP.K. Subban: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 15:28MTLP.K. Subban: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← MTL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dupuis won the faceoff against Desharnais
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLPIT
35Shots on goal29
2.5Expected goals2.9
67Shot attempts49
33Faceoffs won28
3Power plays7
31Penalty minutes13
21Hits33
9Blocked shots24
1Giveaways4
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestDesharnais – Pacioretty – Gallagher8:37

    xG 0.87–0.13 (87%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0

  2. Gionta – Plekanec – Bourque4:09

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Halpern – Moen – Dumont3:30

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  4. Desharnais – Pacioretty – Dumont2:25

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Drewiske6:26

    xG 0.47–0.03 (93%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Markov – Weber2:29

    xG 0.43–0.01 (98%)attempts 6–1goals 1–1

  3. Bouillon – Markov9:52

    xG 0.39–0.05 (88%)attempts 19–3goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMorrow – Dupuis – Bennett4:56

    xG 0.17–0.03 (86%)attempts 2–7goals 1–0

  2. Iginla – Jokinen – Kunitz5:04

    xG 0.02–0.06 (27%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Glass – Vitale3:15

    xG 0.00–0.23 (0%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Glass – Sutter2:21

    xG 0.00–0.33 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Eaton – Despres8:39

    xG 0.09–0.20 (31%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

  2. Murray – Orpik2:02

    xG 0.07–0.18 (27%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

  3. Orpik – Letang12:58

    xG 0.27–0.47 (37%)attempts 8–18goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.9 xGMTL 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #186 of 720 this seasonSwing 0.78 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

PIT winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).