Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 4, 2013·Pepsi Center, Denver

Nashville Predators 1, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 67% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH01017010127
COL113112111336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:50COLPA ParenteauAssists: Jamie McGinn, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.30 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:54COLPatrick BordeleauGWGAssists: Nate Guenin, Marc-Andre Cliche · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:10NSHPaul GaustadAssists: Mike Fisher, Craig Smith · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:48COLPA ParenteauENAssists: Paul Stastny, John Mitchell · Wrist, 0.60 xG1–3
Penalties (14)
  1. P2 0:20COLSteve Downie: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 9:21COLSteve Downie: Charging2 min
  3. P2 9:21NSHShea Weber: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 9:21NSHShea Weber: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 12:10COLSteve Downie: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 16:05NSHKevin Klein: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 19:19NSHMike Fisher: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 3:04COLPA Parenteau: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P3 8:18NSHCraig Smith: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 9:28COLSteve Downie: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 9:28NSHEric Nystrom: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 9:28NSHEric Nystrom: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 9:28COLSteve Downie: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 11:53NSHShea Weber: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCOL
27Shots on goal36
2.3Expected goals3.2
48Shot attempts59
31Faceoffs won23
3Power plays5
16Penalty minutes12
14Hits19
14Blocked shots11
2Giveaways11
10Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Wilson6:23

    xG 0.56–0.17 (77%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Hendricks – Gaustad – Clune6:36

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–1

  3. Fisher – Nystrom – Spaling8:51

    xG 0.17–0.38 (31%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Smith – Bourque8:38

    xG 0.05–0.65 (8%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Klein – Bartley12:16

    xG 0.17–0.22 (45%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Josi7:42

    xG 0.40–0.60 (40%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  3. Ekholm – Jones10:05

    xG 0.26–0.54 (33%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestDownie – O'Reilly – Duchene10:00

    xG 0.93–0.25 (79%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Parenteau – McGinn – MacKinnon6:49

    xG 0.52–0.08 (87%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Bordeleau – McLeod – Cliche4:51

    xG 0.14–0.02 (87%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  4. Tanguay – Mitchell – Stastny11:11

    xG 0.17–0.08 (67%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Johnson13:52

    xG 0.48–0.24 (67%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Guenin – Barrie10:28

    xG 0.60–0.40 (60%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  3. Sarich – Benoit14:06

    xG 0.25–0.33 (43%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.2 xGNSH 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 18/100 · #967 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 67% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).