Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 24, 2013·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Tampa Bay Lightning 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI01231521601544
TBL142721212625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:28TBLMatt CarlePPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Richard Panik · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:24TBLNate ThompsonSHAssists: B.J. Crombeen, Andrej Sustr · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:00CHIBryan BickellAssists: Marcus Kruger, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:36CHIMarian HossaAssists: Patrick Sharp, Jonathan Toews · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:21TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Victor Hedman · Snap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:53CHIPatrick KaneUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:33CHIAndrew ShawPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Tip-in, 0.29 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:03TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Martin St. Louis, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. P3 17:31TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula · Slap, 0.03 xG4–5
  10. P3 18:11CHIJonathan ToewsUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–5
  11. OT 1:16TBLMartin St. LouisGWGAssists: Steven Stamkos, Radko Gudas · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:49CHIMichal Rozsival: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:53TBLSteven Stamkos: Interference2 min
  3. P2 0:33TBLRyan Malone: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 4:10CHIJonathan Toews: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 5:16TBLSteven Stamkos: Interference2 min
  6. P2 10:42TBLRadko Gudas: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 14:40CHIMichal Rozsival: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 0:42TBLValtteri Filppula: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 7:30TBLVictor Hedman: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 17:08CHIMichal Handzus: Delaying game face off violation2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHITBL
44Shots on goal25
3.0Expected goals1.9
73Shot attempts40
38Faceoffs won36
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
14Hits22
7Blocked shots16
7Giveaways10
8Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Toews7:39

    xG 0.32–0.06 (83%)attempts 8–4goals 2–0

  2. Kane – Pirri – Saad2:13

    xG 0.26–0.13 (67%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  3. Handzus – Sharp – Kane5:44

    xG 0.13–0.02 (88%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  4. Hossa – Toews – Saad5:38

    xG 0.18–0.08 (69%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook15:13

    xG 1.01–0.27 (79%)attempts 22–8goals 4–0

  2. Oduya – Hjalmarsson15:29

    xG 0.44–0.38 (54%)attempts 19–8goals 0–1

  3. Rozsival – Leddy8:08

    xG 0.04–0.08 (34%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. St. Louis – Killorn – Stamkos3:56

    xG 0.10–0.15 (40%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

  2. Crombeen – Thompson – Labrie3:00

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Malone – Stamkos10:24

    xG 0.10–0.28 (27%)attempts 4–16goals 1–0

  4. Purcell – Johnson – Palat7:38

    xG 0.09–0.42 (18%)attempts 2–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Brewer – Sustr8:38

    xG 0.31–0.31 (51%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

  2. Salo – Hedman16:32

    xG 0.25–0.36 (41%)attempts 6–17goals 1–0

  3. Carle – Gudas13:56

    xG 0.25–0.83 (23%)attempts 7–21goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.9 xGCHI 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #4 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.47 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).