Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 26, 2013·United Center, Chicago

Minnesota Wild 5, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 60% of the time.

CHI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1821225525
CHI011111214336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:39MINZach ParisePPAssists: Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:03MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Marco Scandella, Matt Cooke · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:46CHIBryan BickellAssists: Nick Leddy, Michal Rozsival · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:42MINJason PominvilleAssists: Mikael Granlund, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:18MINJason PominvilleGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.10 xG4–1
  6. P3 12:51CHIPatrick KanePPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:39MINJustin FontaineAssists: Mikko Koivu, Nate Prosser · Snap, 0.20 xG5–2
  8. P3 19:30CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Brandon Bollig, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 4:34MINMikael Granlund: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 12:34CHIMarian Hossa: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 16:17MINKyle Brodziak: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 17:15CHIAndrew Shaw: Holding2 min
  5. P2 3:42MINRyan Suter: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 5:22MINMikko Koivu: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 18:23CHIMarian Hossa: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 18:30CHIMarcus Kruger: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 3:57CHIPatrick Sharp: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 7:04MINZenon Konopka: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 11:14MINMarco Scandella: Slashing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 16:12MINNino Niederreiter: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCHI
25Shots on goal36
2.5Expected goals3.1
37Shot attempts63
28Faceoffs won29
5Power plays7
14Penalty minutes10
15Hits34
19Blocked shots7
4Giveaways3
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Granlund – Niederreiter6:59

    xG 0.30–0.20 (60%)attempts 5–7goals 2–0

  2. Koivu – Pominville – Parise2:12

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Cooke – Heatley – Brodziak7:57

    xG 0.27–0.47 (37%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  4. Koivu – Parise – Fontaine9:52

    xG 0.39–0.59 (40%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Prosser9:49

    xG 0.65–0.28 (70%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

  2. Suter – Stoner2:04

    xG 0.14–0.04 (79%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Stoner – Prosser2:16

    xG 0.07–0.27 (20%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBickell – Morin – Shaw7:32

    xG 0.64–0.17 (79%)attempts 11–2goals 1–0

  2. Hossa – Sharp – Toews6:00

    xG 0.37–0.19 (66%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Sharp – Kane – Kruger3:02

    xG 0.26–0.09 (74%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Mills – Pirri – Bollig3:06

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRozsival – Leddy10:41

    xG 0.90–0.10 (90%)attempts 16–4goals 2–1

  2. Oduya – Hjalmarsson12:00

    xG 0.74–0.30 (71%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook13:02

    xG 0.65–0.45 (59%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.1 xGMIN 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #342 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.94 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 60% of the time.

CHI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).