Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 1, 2013·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 64% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ016111112239
PIT193909427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:11PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Paul Martin, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:10PITBrandon SutterAssists: Tanner Glass, Craig Adams · Snap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:01PITKris LetangPPGWGAssists: Matt Niskanen, Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P2 5:34PITJayson MegnaAssists: Jussi Jokinen, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–4
  5. P2 9:56CBJDerek MacKenzieAssists: Nick Foligno, Jack Johnson · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P3 19:14CBJRyan JohansenAssists: R.J. Umberger, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:05CBJDavid Savard: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:37PITKris Letang: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 17:23PITCraig Adams: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 2:12CBJJames Wisniewski: Delaying game smothering puck2 min · PPG
  5. P2 6:42PITDustin Jeffrey: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 0:00PITMatt Niskanen: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 0:00CBJBlake Comeau: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 0:25CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Holding2 min
  9. P3 4:26CBJJack Johnson: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 19:34PITKris Letang: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← CBJ attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sutter won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPIT
39Shots on goal27
2.9Expected goals2.1
61Shot attempts51
26Faceoffs won31
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
30Hits21
12Blocked shots11
3Giveaways4
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Comeau – Johansen9:45

    xG 0.65–0.19 (78%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  2. Dubinsky – Letestu – Atkinson11:24

    xG 0.49–0.26 (65%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

  3. Gaborik – Foligno – Anisimov11:30

    xG 0.12–0.35 (25%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Boll – Chaput6:38

    xG 0.05–0.41 (11%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Savard14:33

    xG 0.55–0.17 (77%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

  2. Wisniewski – Murray9:26

    xG 0.54–0.42 (57%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Wisniewski3:57

    xG 0.20–0.09 (69%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Crosby10:13

    xG 0.35–0.20 (63%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Adams – Glass – Sutter9:49

    xG 0.28–0.43 (39%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  3. Jokinen – Malkin – Megna6:38

    xG 0.21–0.45 (32%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Bortuzzo – Maatta8:35

    xG 0.34–0.40 (46%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  2. Orpik – Martin12:34

    xG 0.32–0.41 (43%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Bortuzzo2:33

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.1 xGCBJ 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #447 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 64% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).