Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 7, 2013·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Vancouver Canucks 4, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN3911708434
SJS2605013224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:17SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Tomas Hertl, Tommy Wingels · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:28VANBrad RichardsonAssists: Darren Archibald, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:25VANMike SantorelliAssists: Chris Higgins, Alexandre Burrows · Wrist, 0.46 xG2–1
  4. P1 10:45SJSMike BrownAssists: James Sheppard, Andrew Desjardins · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P1 18:55VANChris HigginsGWGAssists: Alexandre Burrows · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P2 5:22VANZack KassianAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Ryan Stanton · Deflected, 0.13 xG4–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 11:16VANRyan Stanton: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 11:16SJSAndrew Desjardins: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:12VANBrad Richardson: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 9:23VANJason Garrison: Interference2 min
  5. P2 13:37SJSJason Demers: Kneeing2 min
  6. P3 3:45VANTom Sestito: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 9:08SJSDan Boyle: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 12:02SJSBrad Stuart: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 18:21SJSTommy Wingels: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 18:21VANKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSJS
34Shots on goal24
3.7Expected goals2.6
48Shot attempts53
22Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
22Hits18
15Blocked shots7
10Giveaways22
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Kesler14:02

    xG 1.08–0.14 (88%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  2. Higgins – Burrows – Santorelli10:41

    xG 0.75–0.20 (79%)attempts 7–7goals 2–1

  3. Richardson – Kassian – Archibald8:46

    xG 0.43–0.28 (61%)attempts 7–9goals 2–1

  4. Sestito – Dalpe – Welsh3:38

    xG 0.13–0.01 (91%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Tanev12:52

    xG 1.08–0.12 (90%)attempts 7–9goals 2–1

  2. Bieksa – Stanton10:23

    xG 0.63–0.26 (71%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  3. Hamhuis – Bieksa3:30

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHavlat – Couture – Nieto2:12

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Marleau – Sheppard3:24

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Brown – Desjardins – Sheppard4:53

    xG 0.28–0.22 (56%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  4. Kennedy – Brown – Desjardins2:37

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoyle – Stuart12:36

    xG 0.51–0.24 (68%)attempts 17–10goals 2–1

  2. Hannan – Stuart2:06

    xG 0.03–0.30 (10%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Hannan – Demers9:44

    xG 0.08–0.40 (16%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.6 xGVAN 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 45/100 · #628 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.24 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).