Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 21, 2013·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 1, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11007013130
PHI012219215446

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:28BUFTyler MyersPPAssists: Ville Leino, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.49 xG1–0
  2. P2 14:09PHIMatt ReadAssists: Steve Downie, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 15:49PHIMatt ReadGWGAssists: Steve Downie, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P3 9:58PHIVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Mark Streit, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:49PHIScott HartnellENAssists: Adam Hall · Wrist, 0.55 xG1–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:37BUFHenrik Tallinder: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 8:10PHIVincent Lecavalier: Holding2 min
  3. P1 14:09BUFCody Hodgson: Holding2 min
  4. P1 15:28BUFCody McCormick: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P1 16:29PHIMark Streit: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 1:27PHIScott Hartnell: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P2 5:45BUFTyler Myers: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 6:23BUFTyler Ennis: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P2 19:32PHIClaude Giroux: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 7:54BUFVille Leino: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 7:54PHIJay Rosehill: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 7:54PHIZac Rinaldo: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 9:12BUFTyler Myers: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  14. P3 11:52BUFMike Weber: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Ott
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
30Shots on goal46
3.4Expected goals3.7
56Shot attempts74
34Faceoffs won31
5Power plays7
16Penalty minutes22
30Hits27
14Blocked shots15
6Giveaways6
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. McCormick – Scott – Leino3:05

    xG 0.14–0.22 (40%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Hodgson – Ennis – Girgensons8:56

    xG 0.22–0.42 (35%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  3. Stafford – Adam – Grigorenko9:07

    xG 0.20–0.47 (30%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Ott – Moulson – Foligno7:01

    xG 0.10–0.43 (19%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Myers – McNabb2:55

    xG 0.18–0.25 (42%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Weber12:18

    xG 0.33–0.46 (42%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  3. Tallinder – Myers10:02

    xG 0.19–0.45 (30%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDownie – Read – Couturier8:35

    xG 0.72–0.26 (73%)attempts 13–10goals 2–0

  2. Lecavalier – Simmonds – Schenn10:15

    xG 0.68–0.23 (75%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  3. Hall – Rosehill – Rinaldo3:24

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek10:24

    xG 0.26–0.25 (51%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Coburn11:53

    xG 1.01–0.14 (88%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  2. Coburn – Grossmann3:06

    xG 0.22–0.01 (96%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Schenn – Gustafsson8:05

    xG 0.34–0.24 (59%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.7 xGBUF 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #767 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).