Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 27, 2013·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Philadelphia Flyers 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 63% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI070529221
TBL014211210435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 9:15TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Nate Thompson, Tyler Johnson · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:16TBLOndrej PalatSHAssists: Victor Hedman, Andrej Sustr · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P3 5:00TBLVictor HedmanPPGWGAssists: Teddy Purcell, Valtteri Filppula · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–3
  4. P3 18:07PHIVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Brayden Schenn, Mark Streit · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 18:47PHIMark StreitAssists: Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:26TBLTyler JohnsonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.61 xG2–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 5:04PHIJakub Voracek: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:46TBLVictor Hedman: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  3. P2 6:00PHIScott Hartnell: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 6:00TBLEric Brewer: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 10:55TBLAlex Killorn: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 14:28PHIBraydon Coburn: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 3:13PHIScott Hartnell: Slashing2 min · PPG
  8. P3 3:43PHINicklas Grossmann: Boarding2 min
  9. P3 14:03PHISteve Downie: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 14:03TBLKeith Aulie: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 16:36TBLVictor Hedman: Slashing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 19:42PHISteve Downie: Charging2 min
  13. P3 19:42TBLB.J. Crombeen: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 19:42PHIWayne Simmonds: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
48% to win52% to win
← PHI attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Lecavalier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHITBL
21Shots on goal35
1.8Expected goals2.5
43Shot attempts58
25Faceoffs won32
2Power plays4
27Penalty minutes13
30Hits19
10Blocked shots12
8Giveaways8
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLecavalier – Simmonds – Schenn11:05

    xG 0.53–0.37 (59%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

  2. Downie – Couturier – Raffl10:42

    xG 0.24–0.40 (37%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Hall – Rosehill – Rinaldo4:36

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–1

  4. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek12:41

    xG 0.15–0.43 (26%)attempts 5–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Streit – Grossmann14:59

    xG 0.46–0.48 (49%)attempts 12–17goals 0–0

  2. Timonen – Coburn13:51

    xG 0.25–0.27 (47%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Schenn – Gustafsson12:35

    xG 0.49–0.63 (44%)attempts 8–21goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnson – Panik – Palat9:03

    xG 0.28–0.04 (89%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Purcell – Killorn – Kucherov9:06

    xG 0.54–0.46 (54%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Filppula – Brown13:18

    xG 0.26–0.19 (57%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  4. Crombeen – Thompson – Palat2:23

    xG 0.05–0.11 (31%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Sustr13:18

    xG 0.50–0.38 (57%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0

  2. Brewer – Barberio9:07

    xG 0.46–0.34 (57%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Aulie4:01

    xG 0.09–0.03 (71%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.5 xGPHI 1.8 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #414 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.67 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 63% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).