Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 3, 2013·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Ottawa Senators 4, Florida Panthers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 51% of the time.

FLA winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT221114110445
FLA210012010232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:44FLAJonathan HuberdeauPPAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.47 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:22FLABrian CampbellPPAssists: Scottie Upshall, Tom Gilbert · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 10:58OTTJoe CorvoAssists: Clarke MacArthur, Chris Phillips · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:45OTTErik CondraAssists: Jason Spezza, Clarke MacArthur · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:17OTTColin GreeningPPGWGAssists: Joe Corvo, Zack Smith · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:52OTTBobby RyanAssists: Jared Cowen · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 4:14FLAMike Mottau: Interference2 min
  2. P1 5:36OTTMike Hoffman: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 6:23OTTJason Spezza: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:00FLAJimmy Hayes: Holding2 min
  5. P1 0:00FLABrian Campbell: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 8:12FLAMike Mottau: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 10:43FLAScottie Upshall: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 10:43OTTEric Gryba: Interference2 min
  9. P2 17:38FLAShawn Matthias: Holding2 min · PPG
  10. P3 3:35FLAScottie Upshall: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 7:26FLAScottie Upshall: Interference2 min
  12. P3 8:16OTTChris Phillips: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
48% to win52% to win
← OTT attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smith won the faceoff against Goc
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTFLA
45Shots on goal32
2.8Expected goals2.9
71Shot attempts52
44Faceoffs won27
7Power plays3
8Penalty minutes16
26Hits17
11Blocked shots16
3Giveaways2
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeil – Greening – Smith10:06

    xG 0.83–0.25 (77%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  2. Spezza – MacArthur – Condra7:16

    xG 0.58–0.12 (83%)attempts 12–7goals 2–0

  3. Michalek – Conacher – Zibanejad9:03

    xG 0.04–0.28 (12%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Ryan – Turris – Hoffman8:12

    xG 0.19–0.87 (18%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGryba – Cowen9:49

    xG 0.92–0.38 (71%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Phillips – Corvo12:27

    xG 0.43–0.70 (38%)attempts 13–15goals 2–0

  3. Methot – Karlsson15:32

    xG 0.58–0.94 (38%)attempts 22–16goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestUpshall – Bjugstad – Huberdeau7:32

    xG 0.48–0.11 (81%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Bergenheim – Hayes – Barkov3:24

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – Goc – Fleischmann2:35

    xG 0.01–0.09 (13%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Goc – Fleischmann – Winchester5:00

    xG 0.12–0.28 (30%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Gilbert16:01

    xG 1.06–0.74 (59%)attempts 15–17goals 0–0

  2. Olsen – Gudbranson13:11

    xG 0.79–0.55 (59%)attempts 19–19goals 0–2

  3. Campbell – Weaver3:47

    xG 0.16–0.06 (74%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.9 xGOTT 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #373 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.37 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 51% of the time.

FLA winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).